What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Ultravid HD edge sharpness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrankD" data-source="post: 1579119" data-attributes="member: 18544"><p>308,</p><p></p><p>I think you could probably argue that point either way. I remember reading a similar comment from you in reference to the importance of CA-reducing glass and hunting. For the most part I think you are correct. Having a dark object on a dark background (relative of course) does not really lend itself to CA inducing situations.</p><p></p><p>However, I am not convinced that the benefits of ED/FL binoculars is restricted to just obvious CA objects/situations. I have spent a great deal of time just looking back and forth between high quality non-ED bins and their equally high quality FL/ED counterparts. While observing some of the usual "little brown jobs" in the backyard I noticed something interesting. The ED/FL glass binoculars typically produce better contrast and seem to be able to give me the perception of resolving finer details. The latter would make sense if you think about it. CA "muddies" the image by not bringing all of the colors to the same point of focus. If you are able to bring all the colors to the same point of focus then the image should be sharper as "everything is going where you want it to." The image should be sharper, more contrasty and, arguably, brighter.</p><p></p><p>With those thoughts in mind I would expect it to be just as beneficial to a hunter looking for game or a birder trying to differentiate between two species of similar warblers. We want the objects to be as sharp as possible. We want them to jump out at us, so to speak. In my experience ED/FL glass allows for that. </p><p></p><p>I think you could apply a similar analogy to phase coated vs. non-phase coated roof prism binoculars. You can see a satisfying image through a non-phase coated glass but the phase coated one is so much sharper, brighter and more contrasty. It makes it easier and more comfortable to use...assuming all else is equal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrankD, post: 1579119, member: 18544"] 308, I think you could probably argue that point either way. I remember reading a similar comment from you in reference to the importance of CA-reducing glass and hunting. For the most part I think you are correct. Having a dark object on a dark background (relative of course) does not really lend itself to CA inducing situations. However, I am not convinced that the benefits of ED/FL binoculars is restricted to just obvious CA objects/situations. I have spent a great deal of time just looking back and forth between high quality non-ED bins and their equally high quality FL/ED counterparts. While observing some of the usual "little brown jobs" in the backyard I noticed something interesting. The ED/FL glass binoculars typically produce better contrast and seem to be able to give me the perception of resolving finer details. The latter would make sense if you think about it. CA "muddies" the image by not bringing all of the colors to the same point of focus. If you are able to bring all the colors to the same point of focus then the image should be sharper as "everything is going where you want it to." The image should be sharper, more contrasty and, arguably, brighter. With those thoughts in mind I would expect it to be just as beneficial to a hunter looking for game or a birder trying to differentiate between two species of similar warblers. We want the objects to be as sharp as possible. We want them to jump out at us, so to speak. In my experience ED/FL glass allows for that. I think you could apply a similar analogy to phase coated vs. non-phase coated roof prism binoculars. You can see a satisfying image through a non-phase coated glass but the phase coated one is so much sharper, brighter and more contrasty. It makes it easier and more comfortable to use...assuming all else is equal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Ultravid HD edge sharpness
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top