What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Ultruavid HD Plus: Slight slack in the focusing mechanism - do I care?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gilmore Girl" data-source="post: 3351710" data-attributes="member: 106744"><p>I came to the conclusion a long time ago from reading accounts on this forum that even the top optics companies produce lemons here and there. </p><p>User accounts of Leica's CA and sloppy focus , Swaros gritty focus and horrible glare, Zeiss' terrible eye cups and putrid green color cast...these experiences made some consumers switch brand loyalty. Many don't notice or ever experience any of these issues. I also take it with a grain of salt when anyone claims they experience this or that with a particular bin, whether it be negative or positive. it's all so subjective, as has been said here many times, so it's important for people to try for themselves and make up their own mind. I had a Swaro CL and loved it. It had a little grit in the focus which didn't bother me. Others would send it back for this and some have said the CL is basically a waste of money for other reasons...not to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gilmore Girl, post: 3351710, member: 106744"] I came to the conclusion a long time ago from reading accounts on this forum that even the top optics companies produce lemons here and there. User accounts of Leica's CA and sloppy focus , Swaros gritty focus and horrible glare, Zeiss' terrible eye cups and putrid green color cast...these experiences made some consumers switch brand loyalty. Many don't notice or ever experience any of these issues. I also take it with a grain of salt when anyone claims they experience this or that with a particular bin, whether it be negative or positive. it's all so subjective, as has been said here many times, so it's important for people to try for themselves and make up their own mind. I had a Swaro CL and loved it. It had a little grit in the focus which didn't bother me. Others would send it back for this and some have said the CL is basically a waste of money for other reasons...not to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Ultruavid HD Plus: Slight slack in the focusing mechanism - do I care?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top