What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Undescribed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sicklebill" data-source="post: 3684858" data-attributes="member: 33954"><p>May be worth flagging up a couple of Australian new species contenders, no doubt already covered ages back but worth a reminder: The most intriguing is the Dusky-type Grasswren from the S Kimberley, photographed at Pinnacle Creek on Mt Pierre Station in April 1991 by the late Charles Sandbrink. The pic was widely circulated and published in what was then Wingspan (RAOU), but the excellent new "Grasswrens Australian Outback Identities" by Andrew Black and Peter Gower has a good account of the sighting and a nice shot of the bird. It looks very dark and appears to have whitish tail tips, and it's a huge long distance away from any other Dusky-type grasswren, and is suggested to be along the lines of the Kalkadoon/Dusky split. It has been looked for twice, most recently in July 2010 by experienced field workers for the Australian National Wildlife Collection, but given the elusive nature of grasswrens not locating it is not surprising, it's bound to be out there somewhere.</p><p></p><p>The other one is the taxon of what may or may not be Spotted Quail-thrush, which is known from the Ravenshoe area, hundreds of km from the next known population and again in a group where isolated forms may have great taxonomic significance. I have been appallingly slack and not gone to look for it, which I should and will, but the finder has largely kept it under wraps for various reasons, one of which is a fear of museum collectors coming in to get specimen series of it.</p><p></p><p>Oh yes, based on the new book comments I think things are looking good for the split of Opalton (Rusty) Grasswren and Pilbara Grasswren.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sicklebill, post: 3684858, member: 33954"] May be worth flagging up a couple of Australian new species contenders, no doubt already covered ages back but worth a reminder: The most intriguing is the Dusky-type Grasswren from the S Kimberley, photographed at Pinnacle Creek on Mt Pierre Station in April 1991 by the late Charles Sandbrink. The pic was widely circulated and published in what was then Wingspan (RAOU), but the excellent new "Grasswrens Australian Outback Identities" by Andrew Black and Peter Gower has a good account of the sighting and a nice shot of the bird. It looks very dark and appears to have whitish tail tips, and it's a huge long distance away from any other Dusky-type grasswren, and is suggested to be along the lines of the Kalkadoon/Dusky split. It has been looked for twice, most recently in July 2010 by experienced field workers for the Australian National Wildlife Collection, but given the elusive nature of grasswrens not locating it is not surprising, it's bound to be out there somewhere. The other one is the taxon of what may or may not be Spotted Quail-thrush, which is known from the Ravenshoe area, hundreds of km from the next known population and again in a group where isolated forms may have great taxonomic significance. I have been appallingly slack and not gone to look for it, which I should and will, but the finder has largely kept it under wraps for various reasons, one of which is a fear of museum collectors coming in to get specimen series of it. Oh yes, based on the new book comments I think things are looking good for the split of Opalton (Rusty) Grasswren and Pilbara Grasswren. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Undescribed
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top