What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Unsubstantiated claims from Basra Reed Warbler study
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Klaas van Dijk" data-source="post: 3598625" data-attributes="member: 115771"><p><em>Ibis</em>, the <em>Journal of Avian Biology</em> and the <em>Journal of Animal Ecology</em> are highly respected peer-reviewed journals within the field of ornithology and ecology. There have been in the last months contacts with the Editors-of-Chief of these three journals to sort out if they are able to provide comments / reviews of experts who rebut / refute any of the findings in <a href="https://www.academia.edu/33827046" target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/33827046</a> It has turned out that all three journals have no experts, members of the editorial board of these journals, external reviewers who conduct the peer-review for manuscripts for these three journals, etc., who refute / rebut any of the findings in <a href="https://www.academia.edu/33827046" target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/33827046</a></p><p><em>Ibis </em>= <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1474-919X" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1474-919X</a></p><p><em>Journal of Avian Biology</em> = <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-048X" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-048X</a></p><p>Journal of Animal Ecology = <a href="http://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2656/" target="_blank">http://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2656/</a></p><p></p><p>This new finding underlines the views of all ornithologists and birdwatchers that there are indeed no experts (in this field of research) who rebut / refute any of the findings of <a href="https://www.academia.edu/33827046" target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/33827046</a> It must of course be noted that Porter <em>et al</em>. (2015a&b, <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09397140.2015.1023424" target="_blank">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09397140.2015.1023424</a> and <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09397140.2015.1023426" target="_blank">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09397140.2015.1023426</a> ) counts a member of the editorial board of Ibis, professor Martin Collinson <a href="https://www.abdn.ac.uk/ims/profiles/m.collinson" target="_blank">https://www.abdn.ac.uk/ims/profiles/m.collinson</a> (also at the editorial panel of British Birds <a href="https://britishbirds.co.uk/about/british-birds-editorial/" target="_blank">https://britishbirds.co.uk/about/british-birds-editorial/</a> ).</p><p></p><p>This new development is once again a major set-back for Dr. Max Kasparek, the Editor-in-Chief of <em>Zoology in the Middle East</em>, in particular because Dr. Kasparek has not been able, and already for over one year, to provide us with a single review of such an expert. </p><p></p><p>Readers who want to communicate about this new development with Dr. Kasparek can contact him at kasparek AT t-online.de;</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Klaas van Dijk, post: 3598625, member: 115771"] [I]Ibis[/I], the [I]Journal of Avian Biology[/I] and the [I]Journal of Animal Ecology[/I] are highly respected peer-reviewed journals within the field of ornithology and ecology. There have been in the last months contacts with the Editors-of-Chief of these three journals to sort out if they are able to provide comments / reviews of experts who rebut / refute any of the findings in [url]https://www.academia.edu/33827046[/url] It has turned out that all three journals have no experts, members of the editorial board of these journals, external reviewers who conduct the peer-review for manuscripts for these three journals, etc., who refute / rebut any of the findings in [url]https://www.academia.edu/33827046[/url] [I]Ibis [/I]= [url]http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1474-919X[/url] [I]Journal of Avian Biology[/I] = [url]http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-048X[/url] Journal of Animal Ecology = [url]http://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2656/[/url] This new finding underlines the views of all ornithologists and birdwatchers that there are indeed no experts (in this field of research) who rebut / refute any of the findings of [url]https://www.academia.edu/33827046[/url] It must of course be noted that Porter [I]et al[/I]. (2015a&b, [url]http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09397140.2015.1023424[/url] and [url]http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09397140.2015.1023426[/url] ) counts a member of the editorial board of Ibis, professor Martin Collinson [url]https://www.abdn.ac.uk/ims/profiles/m.collinson[/url] (also at the editorial panel of British Birds [url]https://britishbirds.co.uk/about/british-birds-editorial/[/url] ). This new development is once again a major set-back for Dr. Max Kasparek, the Editor-in-Chief of [I]Zoology in the Middle East[/I], in particular because Dr. Kasparek has not been able, and already for over one year, to provide us with a single review of such an expert. Readers who want to communicate about this new development with Dr. Kasparek can contact him at kasparek AT t-online.de; [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Unsubstantiated claims from Basra Reed Warbler study
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top
