What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Unsubstantiated claims from Basra Reed Warbler study
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Klaas van Dijk" data-source="post: 3604260" data-attributes="member: 115771"><p>The comment by Richard Porter <em>et al</em>. (2015) at <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09397140.2015.1023424" target="_blank">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09397140.2015.1023424</a> still attracts lots of new readers with at the moment 2526 views (#2 has 2307 views, #3 has 2189 views, #4 has 1648 views, so almost no new readers for #2, #3 and #4 since my posting of 29 July 2017). </p><p>Also <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/project/Retracting-fraudulent-articles-on-the-breeding-biology-of-the-Basra-Reed-Warbler-Acrocephalus-griseldis" target="_blank">https://www.researchgate.net/project/Retracting-fraudulent-articles-on-the-breeding-biology-of-the-Basra-Reed-Warbler-Acrocephalus-griseldis</a> (at the moment 532 views) and <a href="https://www.academia.edu/33827046" target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/33827046</a> (at the moment 172 views, also published as <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340512" target="_blank">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340512</a>, at the moment 60 views) attract lots of readers.</p><p></p><p>Until now no one has informed me that there are errors and/or mistakes in <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/project/Retracting-fraudulent-articles-on-the-breeding-biology-of-the-Basra-Reed-Warbler-Acrocephalus-griseldis" target="_blank">https://www.researchgate.net/project/Retracting-fraudulent-articles-on-the-breeding-biology-of-the-Basra-Reed-Warbler-Acrocephalus-griseldis</a> and/or in <a href="https://www.academia.edu/33827046" target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/33827046</a> (also published as <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340512" target="_blank">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340512</a>). It seems therefore reasonable to argue that there are no errors and/or mistakes in the texts of any of these urls. </p><p></p><p>I am at the moment communicating rather frequently with several stakeholders, mainly mainstream publishers of peer-reviewed journals (within this field of research), about the fraudulent study on the Basra Reed Warbler. Until now not a single review from an expert / reviewer / specialist who rebuts / refutes any of the findings of <a href="https://www.academia.edu/33827046" target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/33827046</a> has been received from any of these stakeholders.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Klaas van Dijk, post: 3604260, member: 115771"] The comment by Richard Porter [I]et al[/I]. (2015) at [url]http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09397140.2015.1023424[/url] still attracts lots of new readers with at the moment 2526 views (#2 has 2307 views, #3 has 2189 views, #4 has 1648 views, so almost no new readers for #2, #3 and #4 since my posting of 29 July 2017). Also [url]https://www.researchgate.net/project/Retracting-fraudulent-articles-on-the-breeding-biology-of-the-Basra-Reed-Warbler-Acrocephalus-griseldis[/url] (at the moment 532 views) and [url]https://www.academia.edu/33827046[/url] (at the moment 172 views, also published as [url]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340512[/url], at the moment 60 views) attract lots of readers. Until now no one has informed me that there are errors and/or mistakes in [url]https://www.researchgate.net/project/Retracting-fraudulent-articles-on-the-breeding-biology-of-the-Basra-Reed-Warbler-Acrocephalus-griseldis[/url] and/or in [url]https://www.academia.edu/33827046[/url] (also published as [url]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340512[/url]). It seems therefore reasonable to argue that there are no errors and/or mistakes in the texts of any of these urls. I am at the moment communicating rather frequently with several stakeholders, mainly mainstream publishers of peer-reviewed journals (within this field of research), about the fraudulent study on the Basra Reed Warbler. Until now not a single review from an expert / reviewer / specialist who rebuts / refutes any of the findings of [url]https://www.academia.edu/33827046[/url] has been received from any of these stakeholders. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Unsubstantiated claims from Basra Reed Warbler study
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top
