What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Unsubstantiated claims from Basra Reed Warbler study
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Klaas van Dijk" data-source="post: 3607527" data-attributes="member: 115771"><p>Herculean efforts to get reviews / comments from experts / reviewers / peers / specialists (within this field of research) who rebut / refute any of the findings in <a href="https://www.academia.edu/33827046" target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/33827046</a> (also deposited at <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340512" target="_blank">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340512</a>) are until now unsuccessful.</p><p></p><p>Badmouthing about me is of course not allowed. I have therefore filed on 2 May 2017 a formal complaint at the University of Western Australia (UWA) with serious allegations of violations of the Code of Ethics at <a href="http://www.hr.uwa.edu.au/policies/policies/conduct/code/ethics" target="_blank">http://www.hr.uwa.edu.au/policies/policies/conduct/code/ethics</a> against Michael Wise <a href="http://www.web.uwa.edu.au/people/michael.wise" target="_blank">http://www.web.uwa.edu.au/people/michael.wise</a> , a member of the council of COPE <a href="https://publicationethics.org/about/council/michael-wise" target="_blank">https://publicationethics.org/about/council/michael-wise</a> , and therefore co-responsible and co-accountable for the decision of COPE to start with badmouthing about me. </p><p></p><p>The complaint was received in good order by UWA: "From: Complaints; To: Klaas van Dijk; Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 7:39 AM; Subject: C1701021 - complaint re Michael Wise. <em>Dear Mr van Dijk, I write to confirm receipt of your complaint and to provide you with the file reference C1701021</em>. (...)." </p><p></p><p>I received in cc from COPE on 10 May 2017 an e-mail about me which contained towards my opinion new violations of the Code of Ethics of UWA. Michael Wise is of course co-responsible and co-accountable for the contents of this e-mail. I have therefore informed UWA on 11 May 2017 about this new issue. I received on 31 May 2017 from UWA a response in which UWA stated: "<em>I am reviewing all the relevant documentation and the matters will be considered and responded to by a member of the University Executive</em>." This has until now not happened.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Klaas van Dijk, post: 3607527, member: 115771"] Herculean efforts to get reviews / comments from experts / reviewers / peers / specialists (within this field of research) who rebut / refute any of the findings in [url]https://www.academia.edu/33827046[/url] (also deposited at [url]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340512[/url]) are until now unsuccessful. Badmouthing about me is of course not allowed. I have therefore filed on 2 May 2017 a formal complaint at the University of Western Australia (UWA) with serious allegations of violations of the Code of Ethics at [url]http://www.hr.uwa.edu.au/policies/policies/conduct/code/ethics[/url] against Michael Wise [url]http://www.web.uwa.edu.au/people/michael.wise[/url] , a member of the council of COPE [url]https://publicationethics.org/about/council/michael-wise[/url] , and therefore co-responsible and co-accountable for the decision of COPE to start with badmouthing about me. The complaint was received in good order by UWA: "From: Complaints; To: Klaas van Dijk; Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 7:39 AM; Subject: C1701021 - complaint re Michael Wise. [I]Dear Mr van Dijk, I write to confirm receipt of your complaint and to provide you with the file reference C1701021[/I]. (...)." I received in cc from COPE on 10 May 2017 an e-mail about me which contained towards my opinion new violations of the Code of Ethics of UWA. Michael Wise is of course co-responsible and co-accountable for the contents of this e-mail. I have therefore informed UWA on 11 May 2017 about this new issue. I received on 31 May 2017 from UWA a response in which UWA stated: "[I]I am reviewing all the relevant documentation and the matters will be considered and responded to by a member of the University Executive[/I]." This has until now not happened. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Unsubstantiated claims from Basra Reed Warbler study
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top