• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Unusual raptor ? (1 Viewer)

Geoff WORCS

Well-known member
This bird was seen recently in Serbia. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Thanks
Geoff Laight.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2016-04-02-17-58-54-01.jpeg
    Screenshot_2016-04-02-17-58-54-01.jpeg
    78.3 KB · Views: 315
  • Screenshot_2016-04-02-17-59-13-01.jpg
    Screenshot_2016-04-02-17-59-13-01.jpg
    30.2 KB · Views: 268
  • Screenshot_2016-04-02-17-59-19-01.jpg
    Screenshot_2016-04-02-17-59-19-01.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 256
  • Screenshot_2016-04-02-17-59-26-01.jpeg
    Screenshot_2016-04-02-17-59-26-01.jpeg
    119.3 KB · Views: 245

Jonno52

John (a bad birdwatcher)
Supporter
United Kingdom
Geoff, for goodness sake don't take my word as I'm inexpert and usually wrong on ID matters, but it is clearly (?) an accipiter, and very possibly Goshawk. Broad but long wings, slightly "bevelled" tail-edges, and tail length looks about right, also one or two other things. But Goshawks are tricky. Yesterday I finally unticked mine - seen in 1989 at a known site, "looked huge" etc, but just not enough to exclude Sparrowhawk.

I guess there will be other accipiters in the region - others will no doubt advise. Anyway, perhaps this post will get the ball rolling.
 
Last edited:

Geoff WORCS

Well-known member
Sorry for the delayed response to this. Thanks Jono yes I agree after much deliberation Goshawk looks favourite. What threw me was the hooded appearance in pics 1 & 4.
Thanks Wolfbirder
 

Geoff WORCS

Well-known member
Well tail base 'hips' are too broad for sparrowhawk and some evidence of 'fluffy undertail coverts pointing again to gos. Tail corners are rounded and tail end is more rounded not as flat as sprawk.
Wing edges are parallel, sprawk tends to show more rounded bulge to secondaries. Looks very long winged in pic 3.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top