What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Upgrade to a D300?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wildmoreway" data-source="post: 1845740" data-attributes="member: 50189"><p>You will find most of the more recent plastic bodied DSLRS to be surprisingly robust and that this will often survive a 6' drop on to concrete I know this as I have done this with cheaper cameras than the D300, the reality now is that there are DSLRS costing around £500 that will give a D2X a run for its money and probably deliver equal or better pictures if used by a professional, much of this is down to the march of technology, the reality is that a modern camera something costing just over £1,000 like the D300 will greatly surpass the D2X in almost every area, frustrating for someone who paid £5,000 ir so for a D2Xa few years ago but a fact of life nonetheless, this does not mean that the D2X.s successor is not a superior camera to the D300, but for the average user the savings may well be the difference between owning a DSLR or being stuck with a coolpix P6000 superzoom as a certain person's two gallery pictures appear to have been taken with. :-O:-O</p><p></p><p>As for the "cheap" Sigma lenses, there appear to be plenty of excellent shots that have been taken by Sigma and other "cheap" lenses.</p><p></p><p>SW</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wildmoreway, post: 1845740, member: 50189"] You will find most of the more recent plastic bodied DSLRS to be surprisingly robust and that this will often survive a 6' drop on to concrete I know this as I have done this with cheaper cameras than the D300, the reality now is that there are DSLRS costing around £500 that will give a D2X a run for its money and probably deliver equal or better pictures if used by a professional, much of this is down to the march of technology, the reality is that a modern camera something costing just over £1,000 like the D300 will greatly surpass the D2X in almost every area, frustrating for someone who paid £5,000 ir so for a D2Xa few years ago but a fact of life nonetheless, this does not mean that the D2X.s successor is not a superior camera to the D300, but for the average user the savings may well be the difference between owning a DSLR or being stuck with a coolpix P6000 superzoom as a certain person's two gallery pictures appear to have been taken with. :-O:-O As for the "cheap" Sigma lenses, there appear to be plenty of excellent shots that have been taken by Sigma and other "cheap" lenses. SW [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Upgrade to a D300?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top