What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Upgrading from 20D - should I go 40D or 50D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mjobling" data-source="post: 1391180" data-attributes="member: 1593"><p>Well, I took the plunge and got the 50D. Not done any bird photography yet, but some interesting findings already.</p><p></p><p>Out of the box settings have a major flaw. A feature called "Auto Lighting Optimizer" is enabled by default, which leads RAW images to look noisy even at 100 ISO, when viewed in DPP. Once this is disabled and the images which had it enabled have the effect removed in DPP, the there is no noise at low ISO and noise handling via DPP at higher ISOs is superb.</p><p></p><p>I'm wondering if this Auto Lighting Optimizer setting combined with poor RAW handling algorithms from Adobe are causing the lukewarm reception for this camera, as many owners may be oblivious to the problem.</p><p></p><p>Will hopefully get the Bigma on it this weekend and see how it does for the birds, but 100% crops with my Canon EF-L Lenses are looking amazing so far.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mjobling, post: 1391180, member: 1593"] Well, I took the plunge and got the 50D. Not done any bird photography yet, but some interesting findings already. Out of the box settings have a major flaw. A feature called "Auto Lighting Optimizer" is enabled by default, which leads RAW images to look noisy even at 100 ISO, when viewed in DPP. Once this is disabled and the images which had it enabled have the effect removed in DPP, the there is no noise at low ISO and noise handling via DPP at higher ISOs is superb. I'm wondering if this Auto Lighting Optimizer setting combined with poor RAW handling algorithms from Adobe are causing the lukewarm reception for this camera, as many owners may be oblivious to the problem. Will hopefully get the Bigma on it this weekend and see how it does for the birds, but 100% crops with my Canon EF-L Lenses are looking amazing so far. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Upgrading from 20D - should I go 40D or 50D?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top