What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Upgrading from Trinovid BA to Ultravid HD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 1762694" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>Kelvin was wrong about airplanes not being possible and in thinking that x-rays were a hoax. Of course, you can understand how he could easily arrive at the second conclusion since Marie Curie was such a prankster. She once x-rayed a Polish sausage and told her friend the picture was a part of Pierre's anatomy. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>Some think that even when Kelvin was wrong, he was <em>usefully wrong</em>: </p><p><a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/01/01/lord_kelvin_and.html" target="_blank">http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/01/01/lord_kelvin_and.html</a></p><p></p><p>I think the real reason you like Kelvin is because his name sounds like Kevin. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Ron will see what I mean about diehard enthusiasm of Trinnie owners from the posts on this thread. Trinnie owners recognize their <em>je ne sais quoi</em> yet they admit that the Ultravids (or on eBay, Ultrabids) are brighter, sharper, and lighter, but many question whether those attributes are worth the price of admission to the UltraLeicasphere. </p><p></p><p>Which makes me wonder if Ultravids weren't twice the cost even when comparing the prices of Trinnie and Ultravid demos, but only $400 or $500 more, if that <em>je ne sais quoi</em> would appear much less exotic? </p><p></p><p>I think we might find out the answer to that question next month after Mr. Smith Goes to Scotland and traipses up and down the Scottish Highlands with a Trinnie and an Ultravid in his rucksack. </p><p></p><p>Only one bin will come down the mountains with him, the other will be eaten by mountain goats with expensive taste. </p><p></p><p>Tune in next month for the final episode of "Leica: Survivor". <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 1762694, member: 665"] Kelvin was wrong about airplanes not being possible and in thinking that x-rays were a hoax. Of course, you can understand how he could easily arrive at the second conclusion since Marie Curie was such a prankster. She once x-rayed a Polish sausage and told her friend the picture was a part of Pierre's anatomy. :-) Some think that even when Kelvin was wrong, he was [I]usefully wrong[/I]: [URL="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/01/01/lord_kelvin_and.html"]http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/01/01/lord_kelvin_and.html[/URL] I think the real reason you like Kelvin is because his name sounds like Kevin. :-) Ron will see what I mean about diehard enthusiasm of Trinnie owners from the posts on this thread. Trinnie owners recognize their [I]je ne sais quoi[/I] yet they admit that the Ultravids (or on eBay, Ultrabids) are brighter, sharper, and lighter, but many question whether those attributes are worth the price of admission to the UltraLeicasphere. Which makes me wonder if Ultravids weren't twice the cost even when comparing the prices of Trinnie and Ultravid demos, but only $400 or $500 more, if that [I]je ne sais quoi[/I] would appear much less exotic? I think we might find out the answer to that question next month after Mr. Smith Goes to Scotland and traipses up and down the Scottish Highlands with a Trinnie and an Ultravid in his rucksack. Only one bin will come down the mountains with him, the other will be eaten by mountain goats with expensive taste. Tune in next month for the final episode of "Leica: Survivor". :-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Upgrading from Trinovid BA to Ultravid HD
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top