Tell me when you've all finished slating photographers and I'll (reluctantly) retort. Not a single bird spooked, harmed or stressed during the taking of any of these photos. Yes I was in a purpose built hide but I could quite easily have been in my portable pop-up...
http://www.birdforum.net/showpost.php?p=2039371&postcount=141
Hi Sy - I dont think MB was tarring all photographers with the same brush and his comments were supported by Jason. Photography is an important part of birding and in recent years has helped to identify several new birds to the UK as well broadening the appeal of birding with stunning shots of many of the birds found in the UK but perhaps outside your average dude's knowledge. I would be the first to admit there is also irresponsible behaviour with birders / twitchers (straying on to private land / off the path, getting too close, harrassing a clearly weakened bird, being too noisy, cutting back vegetation etc).
All inappropriate actions - whether by birders and photographers - should be challanged and explained to the individuals as to why they are not acceptable. I look forward to all those interested in wildlife and taking a responsible attitude towards it visiting Upton this year and sharing in its environment and experiences.
Phil
MB.
I can quite understand that you're not to keen on photographers. It does seem that we have overtaken Cats, Dog walkers and all else as public enemy number one.
I can inform you that no one with a long telephoto lens would try to get within touching distance of a bird.
I have three of the ridiculous lenses that you dislike so much and the minimum focusing distance is between 3M and 5M. Any nearer is a waste of time as you couldn't focus. Realistically the optimum distance for a medium sized bird would be 5-8 metres distance.
Thanks and best regards, Mike.
For all photographers.
like i stated and has jase, we are not classing all photographers here, and i did say at the time that it wasent any of the regular photographers at the warren, i understand there are photographers out there who do spend the money and oftern considerable time to get the pictures they are after, and take extroudinary lenghts to get them, but i was aiming my posts at those unconsiderate photographers who dont care about the bird, the viewers or anything just to get 'that shot'.
i agree with phil, birders act irrisponsibly to, proberbly for even more selfish reasons than photographers ( litterally no excuse for getting to close to a bird just to watch it, when you have a scope etc), with modern scopes/ telephoto lenses, surely the point of getting too close to a bird isnt worth it anymore as these lenses/scopes can ID a bird from considerable distance.
mike- it seems like you have judged what i think by the 2 post i made, i have absolutly no problem with photographers, and i have many photographer friends, at no point did i say i didnt like photographers, i enjoy seeing pictures of 'exotic' birds around the country which i would never be able to see, and as phil said, withour photographers, we wouldnt have the likes of Eastern-crowned warbler, etc etc on our lists, photography has become as important nowadays in birding that it is overtaking notes, a photo that you can prove was taken where it was is worth alot more than alot of things, and without a photo records dont mean much. i am a keen digiscoper ( not a very good one btw) and enjoy taking photos of birds i see, but arnt really to fussed about what the picture is like if you can tell what the bird is) i enjoy watching birds/ photographers like taking photos of them, i dont see the problem.
my posts was aimed at the photographers (who you cant deny dont exist) who do oftern get to close to birds/ flush them/ and then give photographers a bad name.
and on the subject, i am usually the 1st to point out a good bird, directing (look im fed up of writing photographer so i will just say 'photo' from now on) 'photo' people where the bird/s are and even the best places to view from to get closer views!!!!!!
i did also not mention that i hate the 'ridiculous lenses that you dislike so much', i have always wanted to own one of those leneses that i dislike so much, so that comment was just out of context and by far the result of jumping to conclusions.
MB