What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Using manual mode advice.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tdodd" data-source="post: 1405707" data-attributes="member: 55450"><p>100% correct, Roy. The whole thread is (supposed to be) about exposure, and using manual exposure in particular. Whether the subject is wild, tame or anything in between has bugger all to do with anything. A BIF is a BIF. I fail to see how the presence or absence of jesses makes a scrap of difference to how you go about getting the exposure right. The birds I shot were doing giant circuits, perhaps 200m in diameter, and in some cases disappearing up to a km away or more. They were appearing and disappearing in and out of the tree line and presented a challenge just as demanding as wild birds as far as exposure was concerned. Of course, there was no real challenge because manual exposure kept the exposure correct (or close to it) regardless of the backdrop.</p><p> </p><p>John, I'm afraid I have no idea what point(s) you are trying to make, but you appear to be completely missing the point of the thread. Either that, or I am.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tdodd, post: 1405707, member: 55450"] 100% correct, Roy. The whole thread is (supposed to be) about exposure, and using manual exposure in particular. Whether the subject is wild, tame or anything in between has bugger all to do with anything. A BIF is a BIF. I fail to see how the presence or absence of jesses makes a scrap of difference to how you go about getting the exposure right. The birds I shot were doing giant circuits, perhaps 200m in diameter, and in some cases disappearing up to a km away or more. They were appearing and disappearing in and out of the tree line and presented a challenge just as demanding as wild birds as far as exposure was concerned. Of course, there was no real challenge because manual exposure kept the exposure correct (or close to it) regardless of the backdrop. John, I'm afraid I have no idea what point(s) you are trying to make, but you appear to be completely missing the point of the thread. Either that, or I am. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Using manual mode advice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top