What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
. Venus, Uranus and Mars
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="typo" data-source="post: 3182623" data-attributes="member: 83808"><p>As promised, I had another go with stopping down the objectives and using ND filter to see how the relative size of Venus appeared in the view. To be honest I don't feel I learned a great deal more than that first look.</p><p></p><p>Over the 20 minutes or so I was viewing, the sky got darker and the apparent size generally increased. With the 20x50 it increased from 1/100 FOV to about 1/60FOV. With the use of 3 layer ND filter the apparent size decreased and on both occasions to about 1/600 FOV which is the correct diameter. </p><p></p><p>To cut an uninteresting story short with both a high resolution and low resolution 10x50 the combination of a 25mm aperture and 3ND filters reduced the diameter to less than 1/1000 of the FOV approximating to the real diameter. The shrinkage with the 8x42 appeared somewhat less than the others and was probably about twice the real size but I didn't try anything extra to shrink it further.</p><p></p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="typo, post: 3182623, member: 83808"] As promised, I had another go with stopping down the objectives and using ND filter to see how the relative size of Venus appeared in the view. To be honest I don't feel I learned a great deal more than that first look. Over the 20 minutes or so I was viewing, the sky got darker and the apparent size generally increased. With the 20x50 it increased from 1/100 FOV to about 1/60FOV. With the use of 3 layer ND filter the apparent size decreased and on both occasions to about 1/600 FOV which is the correct diameter. To cut an uninteresting story short with both a high resolution and low resolution 10x50 the combination of a 25mm aperture and 3ND filters reduced the diameter to less than 1/1000 of the FOV approximating to the real diameter. The shrinkage with the 8x42 appeared somewhat less than the others and was probably about twice the real size but I didn't try anything extra to shrink it further. David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
. Venus, Uranus and Mars
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top