What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
. Venus, Uranus and Mars
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3182660" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>. Thanks David.</p><p>With one of your neutral density filters the brightness of Venus is reduced to the brightness of Jupiter, so I wouldn't expect much change.</p><p></p><p>With three neutral density filters, i.e. 1/64 the brightness, Venus's brightness is reduced to the brightness of a first magnitude star, approximately the brightness of the four main stars in Orion. Rigel is brighter, but on average they are about right. That is a quite bright, but not very bright stars.</p><p></p><p>So your findings are about what I would expect.</p><p></p><p>. But I still don't know whether the binocular contributes to the enlarged image of Venus or whether it is only due to our eyes.</p><p></p><p>Can you think of a test that does not involve our eyes, to determine whether the binocular itself increases the image size with a very bright point source or nearly point source object?</p><p>Do spot diagrams take this matter into account?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3182660, member: 111403"] . Thanks David. With one of your neutral density filters the brightness of Venus is reduced to the brightness of Jupiter, so I wouldn't expect much change. With three neutral density filters, i.e. 1/64 the brightness, Venus's brightness is reduced to the brightness of a first magnitude star, approximately the brightness of the four main stars in Orion. Rigel is brighter, but on average they are about right. That is a quite bright, but not very bright stars. So your findings are about what I would expect. . But I still don't know whether the binocular contributes to the enlarged image of Venus or whether it is only due to our eyes. Can you think of a test that does not involve our eyes, to determine whether the binocular itself increases the image size with a very bright point source or nearly point source object? Do spot diagrams take this matter into account? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
. Venus, Uranus and Mars
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top