What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Very interesting website...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ilya Maclean" data-source="post: 1535333" data-attributes="member: 46774"><p>One of the reports by Prof Brown is available <a href="http://www.songbird-survival.org.uk/media/files/mammal_review.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>here</strong></a>. </p><p></p><p>I'm fairly confident the BTO & CAER will take into account minor details like the fact that almost all of the patterns presented would occur in any case, if the predators and prey examined had different habitat requirements (and that's just the tip of the iceberg....)</p><p></p><p>In terms of bad science, <a href="http://www.songbird-survival.org.uk/predators/predation-by-sparrowhawks/" target="_blank"><strong>this</strong></a> has to take the biscuit though. I'm fairly confident that RSPB and English, contrary to SS's suggestions, are fully aware of the fundamental principals of population dynamics (e.g that a lowering in prey numbers due to predation is offset by lower rates of mortality as a result of reduced competition).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ilya Maclean, post: 1535333, member: 46774"] One of the reports by Prof Brown is available [URL="http://www.songbird-survival.org.uk/media/files/mammal_review.pdf"][b]here[/b][/URL]. I'm fairly confident the BTO & CAER will take into account minor details like the fact that almost all of the patterns presented would occur in any case, if the predators and prey examined had different habitat requirements (and that's just the tip of the iceberg....) In terms of bad science, [URL="http://www.songbird-survival.org.uk/predators/predation-by-sparrowhawks/"][b]this[/b][/URL] has to take the biscuit though. I'm fairly confident that RSPB and English, contrary to SS's suggestions, are fully aware of the fundamental principals of population dynamics (e.g that a lowering in prey numbers due to predation is offset by lower rates of mortality as a result of reduced competition). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Very interesting website...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top