• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

very white Common buzzard? (1 Viewer)

tjbirdofprey

Dorset birder in Spain
Whats everyones thoughts on this here Raptor, looks very white in first pic but im 99 percent sure its a Common Buzzard. Just checkingo:D
( sorry bout quality, need a better lense )

Edit: forget to say photos were taken in the UK at Lodmoor in Dorset...
 

Attachments

  • 2009_0421TURBOLISTER0010.JPG
    2009_0421TURBOLISTER0010.JPG
    82.7 KB · Views: 210
  • 2009_0421TURBOLISTER0012.JPG
    2009_0421TURBOLISTER0012.JPG
    98 KB · Views: 241
Last edited:
Looks like Common Buzzard, as daft as it seems the poorest picture (2nd pic) shows off the white neck / high chest band that is usualy distinctive and fairly common in Buzzards ID

Wouldnt risk my house ID ing on such poor pics though;)
 
Looks like Common Buzzard, as daft as it seems the poorest picture (2nd pic) shows off the white neck / high chest band that is usualy distinctive and fairly common in Buzzards ID

Wouldnt risk my house ID ing on such poor pics though;)

yea thats what thought about the band against the chest. Weird color in first pic isnt it, wonder why it looks so white.....o:D
 
They vary hugely in colour and you can find a very white phase bird now and again but also maybe the quality of the pic just giving that impression.

Looking at the pics again, the 2nd pics shows a good Buzzard posture :t:
 
One at Tophill Low NR,E.Yorks first seen last October and still present which was originally miss-id'ed as Osprey and Rough-legged Buzzard. Remember one near Lands End in the 90's that was initially reported as rough-legged.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top