What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Water bird numbers down 70% in the Murray-Darling Basin over ~30 years
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3824554" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p><strong>The Senate was right on the Murray-Darling proposal. Here's why</strong></p><p></p><p>Dr Jamie Pittock is a member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists and an associate professor at the Australian National University</p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/15/the-senate-was-right-on-the-murray-darling-proposal-heres-why" target="_blank">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/15/the-senate-was-right-on-the-murray-darling-proposal-heres-why</a></p><p></p><p><em>"Not even the Murray-Darling Basin Authority knows how much water is being pumped out of the river. More than two-thirds of the water used by irrigators in Queensland is unmetered, and more than a third of water use is unmetered in NSW."</em></p><p></p><p>According to the video in the article, there are 240 dams in the system that hold 30,000 GL (Billions of Litres of water), and yet the MDBA (pushed by irrigators) sought to reduce water returned to the environment by a further 70 GL, despite the originally recommended levels not being achieved. Is there no end to the greed of the corporste irrigating sector ?!</p><p></p><p><em>"Further, the authority’s proposal included allowing a massive increase of 160 billion litres per year of groundwater to be taken from the poorly-studied aquifers across the region.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>The Wentworth Group has had serious concerns about the assumptions used to try and justify the proposal."</em></p><p></p><p><em>"the NSW government has not reversed regulations that it adopted in 2012 which allow irrigators to extract water when the Darling and tributary rivers have low flows.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>This is made possible by regulations to allow irrigators to accumulate unused water allocations from year to year, extract up to 300% of water under some water licences, and remove limits on pumping capacity."</em></p><p></p><p>$13 Billion of taxpayers money, a flawed governance regime, and a near dead river systems basin to show for it !! :storm:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3824554, member: 92780"] [b]The Senate was right on the Murray-Darling proposal. Here's why[/b] Dr Jamie Pittock is a member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists and an associate professor at the Australian National University [url]https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/15/the-senate-was-right-on-the-murray-darling-proposal-heres-why[/url] [I]"Not even the Murray-Darling Basin Authority knows how much water is being pumped out of the river. More than two-thirds of the water used by irrigators in Queensland is unmetered, and more than a third of water use is unmetered in NSW."[/I] According to the video in the article, there are 240 dams in the system that hold 30,000 GL (Billions of Litres of water), and yet the MDBA (pushed by irrigators) sought to reduce water returned to the environment by a further 70 GL, despite the originally recommended levels not being achieved. Is there no end to the greed of the corporste irrigating sector ?! [I]"Further, the authority’s proposal included allowing a massive increase of 160 billion litres per year of groundwater to be taken from the poorly-studied aquifers across the region. The Wentworth Group has had serious concerns about the assumptions used to try and justify the proposal."[/I] [I]"the NSW government has not reversed regulations that it adopted in 2012 which allow irrigators to extract water when the Darling and tributary rivers have low flows. This is made possible by regulations to allow irrigators to accumulate unused water allocations from year to year, extract up to 300% of water under some water licences, and remove limits on pumping capacity."[/I] $13 Billion of taxpayers money, a flawed governance regime, and a near dead river systems basin to show for it !! :storm: Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Water bird numbers down 70% in the Murray-Darling Basin over ~30 years
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top