What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Waterproof, sealed Porros,?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WJC" data-source="post: 3308042" data-attributes="member: 25191"><p>Hi Jerry, love the cap:</p><p></p><p>Forums on the telescope making side of the house are replete with folks talking of how they PLAN to “optimize” their Newtonian. From a reality perspective, this is just so much chatter as people strive to have something to talk about and perhaps elevate themselves above their neighbor. Throwing time and dollars at a ¾-wave mirror is (IMNSHO) a huge waste of time.</p><p></p><p>The bottom line: if you want to optimize your Newtonian, make a mirror that’s 1/4-wave AT THE EYEPIECE.</p><p></p><p>Over here, we talk about purging and sealing a lot of binos that could be used as sieves. </p><p></p><p>A story:</p><p></p><p>I always purged binos with DRY nitrogen. When the price of repair went up, and people began to balk, I started to wonder how the bino would hold up WITHOUT being purged and filled. Being in Seattle at the time, and working with the ALASKA fishing fleet, I thought I would give it a try. I was working most with the Fujinons and Swifts—the Fujinon ARs and the Swift Seahawks of the day were virtually the same—and knew their seals were quite good.</p><p></p><p>It worked; NONE came back for condensation problems. And I can assure you the conditions in the Bering Sea in winter will be much harsher than that experienced by most BF members. That saved time for me and money for my customer.</p><p></p><p>The second bottom line: if the bino is really a quality “waterproof” instrument, filling it with nitrogen, argon, Silly-Putty, or corn flakes makes little difference … or didn't at that time.</p><p></p><p>But, that’s just the rambling of a silly old man. :cat:</p><p></p><p>Bill</p><p></p><p>PS I was chatting with Alan Hale last week who was chuckling over his visit to a bino plant in China, the week before. He said the company ADVERTISES their binos as being “Argon filled” when, in fact, there were no signs of them having a purging and filling capability of any kind. It’s not one world.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WJC, post: 3308042, member: 25191"] Hi Jerry, love the cap: Forums on the telescope making side of the house are replete with folks talking of how they PLAN to “optimize” their Newtonian. From a reality perspective, this is just so much chatter as people strive to have something to talk about and perhaps elevate themselves above their neighbor. Throwing time and dollars at a ¾-wave mirror is (IMNSHO) a huge waste of time. The bottom line: if you want to optimize your Newtonian, make a mirror that’s 1/4-wave AT THE EYEPIECE. Over here, we talk about purging and sealing a lot of binos that could be used as sieves. A story: I always purged binos with DRY nitrogen. When the price of repair went up, and people began to balk, I started to wonder how the bino would hold up WITHOUT being purged and filled. Being in Seattle at the time, and working with the ALASKA fishing fleet, I thought I would give it a try. I was working most with the Fujinons and Swifts—the Fujinon ARs and the Swift Seahawks of the day were virtually the same—and knew their seals were quite good. It worked; NONE came back for condensation problems. And I can assure you the conditions in the Bering Sea in winter will be much harsher than that experienced by most BF members. That saved time for me and money for my customer. The second bottom line: if the bino is really a quality “waterproof” instrument, filling it with nitrogen, argon, Silly-Putty, or corn flakes makes little difference … or didn't at that time. But, that’s just the rambling of a silly old man. :cat: Bill PS I was chatting with Alan Hale last week who was chuckling over his visit to a bino plant in China, the week before. He said the company ADVERTISES their binos as being “Argon filled” when, in fact, there were no signs of them having a purging and filling capability of any kind. It’s not one world. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Waterproof, sealed Porros,?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top