What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zen Ray
We love the optics. What about the styling?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spitfiretriple" data-source="post: 1726516" data-attributes="member: 78740"><p>Good point about the monopod/~ location. Though small low-power bins like these will spend little if any of their time on a monopod/~.</p><p></p><p>Agree that the open bridge design is becoming steadily more popular. And for good reasons. But whilst an open bridge clearly affects the look of the bin, I was thinking beyond that, to the colour, texture, and shaping of the bin as a whole. I myself, for example, don't care for the way that Swarovski, and Zen-Ray, tries to make the double bridge look like a "whole". I prefer the "two separate sections" look of the Viking and Minox. It seems more honest somehow.</p><p></p><p>Also agree that when the optics are as good as they are, we are sometimes reduced to discussing relative trivialities, such as spaceman names or styling. Nevertheless, in the world of consumer electronics, Apple is just one of many competing manufacturers, most with innovative and clever products that work well. But Apple goes further than most of its competitors, it demands that all its products don't just work well, but look good and feel good. Apple's success may have more than a little to do with that philosophy...</p><p></p><p>Zen-Ray's situation is rather special, though hardly unique. It is a new entrant in a mature market. It has decided, with the ED2s at least, to go for the high end of the market - which is difficult without an established brand name to support the premium prices needed to pay for the premium quality. Rather than try to establish itself straight away, it has effectively copied the styling of one of the market leaders - Swarovski. I can understand why Charles has done this. But now, as the Zen-Ray name becomes increasingly well-known among the cognoscenti, it would be nice to see Zen-Ray's next move be to distance its styling from that of a wannabee.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spitfiretriple, post: 1726516, member: 78740"] Good point about the monopod/~ location. Though small low-power bins like these will spend little if any of their time on a monopod/~. Agree that the open bridge design is becoming steadily more popular. And for good reasons. But whilst an open bridge clearly affects the look of the bin, I was thinking beyond that, to the colour, texture, and shaping of the bin as a whole. I myself, for example, don't care for the way that Swarovski, and Zen-Ray, tries to make the double bridge look like a "whole". I prefer the "two separate sections" look of the Viking and Minox. It seems more honest somehow. Also agree that when the optics are as good as they are, we are sometimes reduced to discussing relative trivialities, such as spaceman names or styling. Nevertheless, in the world of consumer electronics, Apple is just one of many competing manufacturers, most with innovative and clever products that work well. But Apple goes further than most of its competitors, it demands that all its products don't just work well, but look good and feel good. Apple's success may have more than a little to do with that philosophy... Zen-Ray's situation is rather special, though hardly unique. It is a new entrant in a mature market. It has decided, with the ED2s at least, to go for the high end of the market - which is difficult without an established brand name to support the premium prices needed to pay for the premium quality. Rather than try to establish itself straight away, it has effectively copied the styling of one of the market leaders - Swarovski. I can understand why Charles has done this. But now, as the Zen-Ray name becomes increasingly well-known among the cognoscenti, it would be nice to see Zen-Ray's next move be to distance its styling from that of a wannabee. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zen Ray
We love the optics. What about the styling?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top