• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

What Bird Names Would You Change? (1 Viewer)

I'd prefer a return to the evocative eponyms that have been suppressed in several Eastern Palearctic species names...
  • Severtzov's (not Chinese) Grouse
  • Temminck's (not Japanese) Cormorant
  • Hume's Groundpecker (how can such a characterful species be reduced to 'Ground Tit'?!)
  • Severtzov's (not White-browed) Tit-warbler
  • Kozlov's (not Tibetan) Babax
  • Père David's (not Plain!) Laughingthrush
  • Sukatschev's (not Snowy-cheeked) Laughingthrush
  • Biet's (not White-speckled) Laughingthrush
  • Prince Henri's (not Brown-cheeked) Laughingthrush
  • Ludlow's (not Brown-throated) Fulvetta
  • Hodgson's (not White-throated) Bushchat
  • Theresa's (not Afghan) Snowfinch
  • Adams's (not Tibetan) Snowfinch
  • Roborovski's (not Tibetan) Rosefinch
  • Kozlov's (not Tibetan) Bunting

I agree that they sound nice but the regional names are more helpful in a wider context and I believe that some folk associate the old names with colonialism?

From Europe I like Bluestart (Red-flanked Bluetail) and Nun Goose (for Barnacle Goose). Many European bird names are more logical than the English equivalent but there are some funny ones from Hungary like 'Underpants Buzzard' for Rough-legged Buzzard as well as the politically incorrect 'Gypsy Duck' for Ferruginous Duck (skin colour!) and it always makes me laugh when I hear people say 'gébics' (= shrike), which is pronounced 'gay bitch';)
 
Ok, so we'll call our sparrows buntings... however, we get to keep using warblers because... well, quite frankly... ours are so much nicer. So the old world birds get to be 'Sylvias' or 'Acros' or whatever you are already calling them. Plus, all your warblers are a heterogeneous hodgepodge of different bird families, anyways, so it makes perfect sense to me to make a big rehaul.

Don't you like the ring of Dartford Sylvia or Clamorous Reed-Acro or even Cetti's Cettia?

Carlos

C'mon guys, you can call your birds anything you want - I just wish you'd sort out your fannies and pants.....it's just wrong ;)
And H - Zeledonia all the way for sure!
 
I'd prefer a return to the evocative eponyms that have been suppressed in several Eastern Palearctic species names...
  • Severtzov's (not Chinese) Grouse
  • Temminck's (not Japanese) Cormorant
  • Hume's Groundpecker (how can such a characterful species be reduced to 'Ground Tit'?!)
  • Severtzov's (not White-browed) Tit-warbler
  • Kozlov's (not Tibetan) Babax
  • Père David's (not Plain!) Laughingthrush
  • Sukatschev's (not Snowy-cheeked) Laughingthrush
  • Biet's (not White-speckled) Laughingthrush
  • Prince Henri's (not Brown-cheeked) Laughingthrush
  • Ludlow's (not Brown-throated) Fulvetta
  • Hodgson's (not White-throated) Bushchat
  • Theresa's (not Afghan) Snowfinch
  • Adams's (not Tibetan) Snowfinch
  • Roborovski's (not Tibetan) Rosefinch
  • Kozlov's (not Tibetan) Bunting

Agree we should retain the commemorative names. I seem to recall Ben King being behind a bit of a push on the move to the politically correct yet ultra-bland new names. This extended to his names for the Philippine endemics and may have included Azure-breasted (Steere's) and Whiskered (Koch's).

When I go to Tibet, I'll be searching for Roborovski's and Koslov's, not Tibetan..and Tibetan..

cheers, alan
 
I'm sure I read it on BF that "Common" gull was because they supposedly frequent commons, not because of their abundance.
 
I have never subscribed to the name of Wallcreeper!...It sounds like a pseudonym for a pair of Rock-climbers boots!....

A bird this enigmatic and majesterial, should have a name more akin to it's sheer beauty, how about... the ''Crimson-Spectacle'', Butterfly-bird, the ''Crimson Marvel'' (perhaps sounding a bit too much like a cartoon action hero?), the ''Crimson-gorge gripper'' (perhaps too sensitive a name for those that need it? ;)), the Scarlet-grail or just Crimson-flutterwing.....anything but bloody Wallcreeper!

Ps...I've included a shot of the ''poor man's Wallcreeper''...
 

Attachments

  • Crimson Underwing.jpg
    Crimson Underwing.jpg
    162.6 KB · Views: 77
Common/Mew Gull

My understanding has always been that "Common Gull" & "Common Sandpiper" were so named because, unlike most other gulls and sandpipers in the UK, they were "common" inland as well as on the coast.
I'm sure I read it on BF that "Common" gull was because they supposedly frequent commons, not because of their abundance.
Yet another theory...

Greenoak 1997 (British Birds: their Folklore, Names and Literature):
Common Gull
...it would seem that the word 'common' refers not to the frequency of occurrence but is used in the Middle English sense of having no distinguishing features.
Alternative British names listed by Francesca Greenoak...
  • Mew, Sea Mew (Scotland), Maa, Mar (Kirkcudbright), Sea Maw, Sea Mall (Scotland), Blue Maa (Shetland), Small Maa (Shetland), White Maa (Orkney), Winter Mew, Winter Gull, Gow (Aberdeen), Cob, Sea Cobb (Kent, Essex, Suffolk, Norfolk), Annet (Northumberland), Coddy Moddy, Winter Bonnet, Barley Bird (S Devon), Seed Bird (Roxburgh, Teviotdale), Green-billed Gull.
 
Last edited:
I get so confused by all these birds named after people – I actually prefer descriptive names.
I'd prefer a return to the evocative eponyms that have been suppressed in several Eastern Palearctic species names...
  • Severtzov's (not Chinese) Grouse – why not Sichuan Grouse?
  • Temminck's (not Japanese) Cormorant – all Koreans would agree.
  • Hume's Groundpecker (how can such a characterful species be reduced to 'Ground Tit'?!) – well, it is a Ground Tit! But when I saw it it also pecked the ground quite vigorously. But why to involve Hume is beyond me.
  • Severtzov's (not White-browed) Tit-warbler – Its white brow is definitely not the defining feature that strikes you in this bird. I also think it and the even better Crested deserve something better than Tit-Warbler. As they are "long-tailed tits", why not Jewel-Tit?
  • Kozlov's (not Tibetan) Babax
  • Père David's (not Plain!) Laughingthrush - confusing; it is boring-looking!
  • Sukatschev's (not Snowy-cheeked) Laughingthrush - confusing
  • Biet's (not White-speckled) Laughingthrush - confusing
  • Prince Henri's (not Brown-cheeked) Laughingthrush - confusing
  • Ludlow's (not Brown-throated) Fulvetta - the alternative name is plainly wrong, so Ludlow can keep that one.
  • Hodgson's (not White-throated) Bushchat - look at it – it's a Stonechat!
  • Theresa's (not Afghan) Snowfinch - hey, give Afghanistan a break.
  • Adams's (not Tibetan) Snowfinch - as I have seen two species called Tibetan Snowfinch, this one can stay.
  • Roborovski's (not Tibetan) Rosefinch - rosefinches... I won't see them anyway.
  • Kozlov's (not Tibetan) Bunting - alright then.
 
Wow. I haven't had a chance to check this thread for a few days...superb response. Love the "small gulls" and "big gulls" idea, Chocolate-headed Gull, Greenishlegs and Orangelegs.

Guillemot and Black Guillemot have always annoyed me too. I prefer Greyish-Legged Guillemot and Orangey-red-Legged Guillemot.
 
I'm sure I read it on BF that "Common" gull was because they supposedly frequent commons, not because of their abundance.

Yes, that's an alternative theory. Here's a reference for it:
Okill, Dave (2004), "English names for Western Palearctic birds", British Birds 97(7): 348-9
 
Wow. I haven't had a chance to check this thread for a few days...superb response. Love the "small gulls" and "big gulls" idea, Chocolate-headed Gull, Greenishlegs and Orangelegs.

Guillemot and Black Guillemot have always annoyed me too. I prefer Greyish-Legged Guillemot and Orangey-red-Legged Guillemot.

You could call some of them murres like we do. I find it really odd to call something by just one single name when there are other species with the same name -
guillemot, sparrow, whitethroat, redshank etc. There seem to be an awful lot of examples
 
I'm not generally one for changing names for the sake of it. I love local names and the variations that occur, much to the annoyance (and to me, endless amusement) of purists who want all vernacular names standardised.;)

I would echo Richard Klim's sentiments on many of the evocative old names which have bizarrely been changed for reasons I simply cannot fathom.

Having said all that, I'd be tempted to change a few names which are just plain boring: here in Aus we have a Brown Falcon, a Grey Falcon and a Black Falcon. Another name for the Australian Hobby is Little Falcon. Descriptively accurate they may be, but they are very dull names. Similarly we also have a Brown Honeyeater, A Grey Honeyeater, a Black Honeyeater, a Yellow Honeyeater and many others that are purely descriptive of how they look. what I'd love to see for this large family (just for fun you understand) are names like the sort of brilliant names given to North American Wood Warblers. With adjectives like 'Prothonotary', 'Magnolia', and 'Parula' they would seem infinitely more exotic!

Having said that, I would never change the name of the Yellow Oriole (which is Green) or the Figbird (which is a largely yellow coloured oriole) to Yellow Oriole; I like illogical and idiosyncratic names. The more the merrier.B :);)
 
I would not change any bird names. We all know what species with the names we have so why change things. I remember seeing Mew gull some years ago in Suffolk Bird Report and thinking " what the hell is a mew gull". It took me 20 years to stop calling dunnocks , hedge sparrows , so I am going to be dammed if I am going to start calling them hedge accentors.

Leave bird names alone so we all know what we are talking about.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top