What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
What defines what an Alpha binoculars is?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 1584854" data-attributes="member: 665"><p><strong>alpha bins: see pres·tige (prĕ-stēzh', -stēj')</strong></p><p></p><p>I think Jay was the closest to the correct definition. </p><p></p><p>The term "alpha bin" is about one thing and one thing only: Prestige. </p><p></p><p>The Chinese ED bins have proven that point. So have second caste "betas" such as the Nikon SE and LX.</p><p></p><p>Another piece of evidence is that some people refuse to give the EDG "alpha status" because it's not part of the "Teutonic Trio". </p><p></p><p>It's made in a place that when I grew up was associated with cheap goods - Japan. Times have changed but snobbery never changes. </p><p></p><p>A shockingly honest BF member once wrote that he was shopping for an "alpha bin," and after trying a number of models, it came down a choice between two: Leica Ultravid or Swarovski EL. </p><p></p><p>He wrote that although he felt the EL had better optics, the "red dot" would carry more "cachet" in the field with other birders, so he bought the Lecia. That's the best definition of "alpha bin" I've ever read. </p><p></p><p>To be clear, this is not to say that the FL, Ultravid, or EL are not top notch bins in their own right, but rather that "snob appeal" has more to do with the salivary interest in them than their optics or mechanics. </p><p></p><p>Some of the other bins mentioned in this thread such as the Nikon 8x32 SE are <em> reference standards </em>. They are the bins that the alphas aspire to be like at quadruple the price, and therefore, quadruple the prestige. </p><p></p><p>Porros had ED glass 20 years ago. What's so "innovative" about that? When optics manufacturers switched over to lead-free glass, it increased CA. So like other "innovations" associated with roofs, it was compensatory. That's not progress, that's catching up, my friends!</p><p></p><p>I'd rather be a snail than escargot, yes I would, if I could, I surely wo-o-ould, hm-m hm-m mm mm. </p><p></p><p>Ω </p><p></p><p>(the bin enthusiast formerly known as "The Omega Man")</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 1584854, member: 665"] [b]alpha bins: see pres·tige (prĕ-stēzh', -stēj')[/b] I think Jay was the closest to the correct definition. The term "alpha bin" is about one thing and one thing only: Prestige. The Chinese ED bins have proven that point. So have second caste "betas" such as the Nikon SE and LX. Another piece of evidence is that some people refuse to give the EDG "alpha status" because it's not part of the "Teutonic Trio". It's made in a place that when I grew up was associated with cheap goods - Japan. Times have changed but snobbery never changes. A shockingly honest BF member once wrote that he was shopping for an "alpha bin," and after trying a number of models, it came down a choice between two: Leica Ultravid or Swarovski EL. He wrote that although he felt the EL had better optics, the "red dot" would carry more "cachet" in the field with other birders, so he bought the Lecia. That's the best definition of "alpha bin" I've ever read. To be clear, this is not to say that the FL, Ultravid, or EL are not top notch bins in their own right, but rather that "snob appeal" has more to do with the salivary interest in them than their optics or mechanics. Some of the other bins mentioned in this thread such as the Nikon 8x32 SE are [i] reference standards [/i]. They are the bins that the alphas aspire to be like at quadruple the price, and therefore, quadruple the prestige. Porros had ED glass 20 years ago. What's so "innovative" about that? When optics manufacturers switched over to lead-free glass, it increased CA. So like other "innovations" associated with roofs, it was compensatory. That's not progress, that's catching up, my friends! I'd rather be a snail than escargot, yes I would, if I could, I surely wo-o-ould, hm-m hm-m mm mm. Ω (the bin enthusiast formerly known as "The Omega Man") [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
What defines what an Alpha binoculars is?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top