What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
What defines what an Alpha binoculars is?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Conville" data-source="post: 1584905" data-attributes="member: 63161"><p>If the consensus of BF members is to bestow the alpha moniker on Zeiss, I would not argue, but not for historical reasons. Though I agree that Zeiss has been innovative, at the time I bought my first pair of full size Leicas (1991) Zeiss models were not waterproof, had fold down rubber eyecups, and a non-locking diopter. The Trinovids I bought were waterproof to 5 meters, had pop out eyecups, and the much copied center locking diopter. Leica also had/have a unique focus system that didn't gum up in cold weather. Oh yeah, they also had very effective hard, scratch resistant coatings. Even my <span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><em>1982</em></span> 10x25 Trinovids had pop out eyecups.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, that was then and this now. By sheer vote of hands I'd guess Zeiss wins the prize <span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><em>today, here on Bird Forum</em></span>, for alpha bin 2009. I don't happen to agree necessarily, but hey, viva la difference!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Conville, post: 1584905, member: 63161"] If the consensus of BF members is to bestow the alpha moniker on Zeiss, I would not argue, but not for historical reasons. Though I agree that Zeiss has been innovative, at the time I bought my first pair of full size Leicas (1991) Zeiss models were not waterproof, had fold down rubber eyecups, and a non-locking diopter. The Trinovids I bought were waterproof to 5 meters, had pop out eyecups, and the much copied center locking diopter. Leica also had/have a unique focus system that didn't gum up in cold weather. Oh yeah, they also had very effective hard, scratch resistant coatings. Even my [FONT="Comic Sans MS"][I]1982[/I][/FONT] 10x25 Trinovids had pop out eyecups. Anyway, that was then and this now. By sheer vote of hands I'd guess Zeiss wins the prize [FONT="Comic Sans MS"][I]today, here on Bird Forum[/I][/FONT], for alpha bin 2009. I don't happen to agree necessarily, but hey, viva la difference! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
What defines what an Alpha binoculars is?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top