What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
What determines our color sensitivity as looking through bins?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="edz" data-source="post: 1379292" data-attributes="member: 44073"><p>To support comments that coatings make a difference in color cast (and obviously total transmission), I'm posting two paragraphs here from an article by Roland Christen, noted optics expert and Owner Astro Physics.</p><p></p><p>Comparative Coatings and Obstructions</p><p>by Roland Christen</p><p>The test for a really good coating is to set it outside in the shade with the eye end up so that light from the sky can flood the optics. The other end should have a black end cap attached. Look straight down into the eyepiece to see how much of the light is coming back out at you. This is the light that is reflected back from the various coated surfaces, light that should have gone through and be absorbed by the black end cap. The darker the optics look, the more light gets through to your eye, and the less is reflected back or scattered. The really bad oculars literally glow with reflected light.</p><p></p><p>Although all the eyepieces in this picture are "multicoated", they are not optimized. The different elements in a typical wide angle ocular are made from different index glass. For each index there exists an optimum coating design, one that will achieve the lowest reflectivity for that element. For optimum efficiency, each element must be coated with a different coating design according to its refractive index. What is often done is to coat all elements with the same formula. This results in some wavelengths getting attenuated more than others, usually in the blue end of the spectrum. These eyepieces will show a distinct yellowing of the image, as well as an overall lower transmission efficiency. This can be seen in the second image where I have compared the 25mm Zeiss Ortho with the 3rd ocular. You can see a definite yellowing of the white wall behind the ocular, as well as a faint reflection of my head and sky behind me, which is completely missing in the Zeiss.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://geogdata.csun.edu/~voltaire/roland/coating.html" target="_blank">http://geogdata.csun.edu/~voltaire/roland/coating.html</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="edz, post: 1379292, member: 44073"] To support comments that coatings make a difference in color cast (and obviously total transmission), I'm posting two paragraphs here from an article by Roland Christen, noted optics expert and Owner Astro Physics. Comparative Coatings and Obstructions by Roland Christen The test for a really good coating is to set it outside in the shade with the eye end up so that light from the sky can flood the optics. The other end should have a black end cap attached. Look straight down into the eyepiece to see how much of the light is coming back out at you. This is the light that is reflected back from the various coated surfaces, light that should have gone through and be absorbed by the black end cap. The darker the optics look, the more light gets through to your eye, and the less is reflected back or scattered. The really bad oculars literally glow with reflected light. Although all the eyepieces in this picture are "multicoated", they are not optimized. The different elements in a typical wide angle ocular are made from different index glass. For each index there exists an optimum coating design, one that will achieve the lowest reflectivity for that element. For optimum efficiency, each element must be coated with a different coating design according to its refractive index. What is often done is to coat all elements with the same formula. This results in some wavelengths getting attenuated more than others, usually in the blue end of the spectrum. These eyepieces will show a distinct yellowing of the image, as well as an overall lower transmission efficiency. This can be seen in the second image where I have compared the 25mm Zeiss Ortho with the 3rd ocular. You can see a definite yellowing of the white wall behind the ocular, as well as a faint reflection of my head and sky behind me, which is completely missing in the Zeiss. [url]http://geogdata.csun.edu/~voltaire/roland/coating.html[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
What determines our color sensitivity as looking through bins?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top