What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
what is the best scope for digiscoping??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paul Corfield" data-source="post: 1507373" data-attributes="member: 19132"><p>Yeah, like Rick said, some of that fringing with the LX3 was probably from the eyepiece and some was probably from the LX3 too. Only way to tell if the scope is introducing any is to shoot with just the scope and dslr with no other optics in the way.</p><p></p><p>The 80ED is short enough to carry quite easily but the 100ED I think would be just for limited travelling. The 80ED I carry in one hand with the tripod in my other hand and all my other gear is in my back pack. Some sort of carrying handle could easily be rigged up to make it even easier but I've personally not had the need. I carry my 80ED all over the countryside on an average of 3-4 hours per trip. The 100ED isn't all that much heavier, I think it's less than a couple of pounds difference but the length of the thing would be the limiting factor. All depends on terrain, how far away the subject is likely to be and how far you see yourself carrying it. </p><p></p><p>Paul.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paul Corfield, post: 1507373, member: 19132"] Yeah, like Rick said, some of that fringing with the LX3 was probably from the eyepiece and some was probably from the LX3 too. Only way to tell if the scope is introducing any is to shoot with just the scope and dslr with no other optics in the way. The 80ED is short enough to carry quite easily but the 100ED I think would be just for limited travelling. The 80ED I carry in one hand with the tripod in my other hand and all my other gear is in my back pack. Some sort of carrying handle could easily be rigged up to make it even easier but I've personally not had the need. I carry my 80ED all over the countryside on an average of 3-4 hours per trip. The 100ED isn't all that much heavier, I think it's less than a couple of pounds difference but the length of the thing would be the limiting factor. All depends on terrain, how far away the subject is likely to be and how far you see yourself carrying it. Paul. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
what is the best scope for digiscoping??
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top