What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Tips For New Birders
What kind of camera would I need?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kittykat23uk" data-source="post: 1211713" data-attributes="member: 55291"><p>Just to add a few more observations. To get the best out of these superzooms you need to use them in good light. This is true for pretty much all of these types of cameras. </p><p></p><p>On a bright sunny day if you keep the ISO speed to 100 you can normally achieve some really sharp results without much if any, visible noise. When people say it is not good in low light, I'll give you an example. I was out yesterday, it was a grey day, rain was spitting and cloud cover was thick and low. I positioned myself by a local river where there were some grey wagtails about three to four metres away. I could not get anywhere near a good shutter speed with ISO less than 400. At 400 results were still mainly blurry due to slow shutter speed. I had to bump it up to 800 ISO to get any keepers and even then I was only getting about 1/160th of a second. I should point out this was hand held with a teleconverter attached. I'll post some pictures later on. In contrast, on a sunny evening with a low sun I was getting some nice shots of the same birds at 200 ISO or less.:t: The higher the ISO speed, the more noisy the results are so its best to keep this as low as possible (but of course it is a trade off because if your shutter speed is too slow, the picture will be blurry).</p><p></p><p>The same considerations apply if you are shooting within a woodland. So, to sum up:</p><p></p><p>Pros: Good value for money (a lot cheaper than a DSLR) Lightweight, portable, great zoom and macro capability - no need to change lenses so you can shoot birds, insects and landscapes all in one session. easy to use with lots of good features and manual controls to play around with. Movie mode. Good image quality in good light. Low maintenance.</p><p></p><p>Cons: noisy sensors meaning poorer image quality in overcast/shaded conditions. Not so great for birds in flight (not responsive enough).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kittykat23uk, post: 1211713, member: 55291"] Just to add a few more observations. To get the best out of these superzooms you need to use them in good light. This is true for pretty much all of these types of cameras. On a bright sunny day if you keep the ISO speed to 100 you can normally achieve some really sharp results without much if any, visible noise. When people say it is not good in low light, I'll give you an example. I was out yesterday, it was a grey day, rain was spitting and cloud cover was thick and low. I positioned myself by a local river where there were some grey wagtails about three to four metres away. I could not get anywhere near a good shutter speed with ISO less than 400. At 400 results were still mainly blurry due to slow shutter speed. I had to bump it up to 800 ISO to get any keepers and even then I was only getting about 1/160th of a second. I should point out this was hand held with a teleconverter attached. I'll post some pictures later on. In contrast, on a sunny evening with a low sun I was getting some nice shots of the same birds at 200 ISO or less.:t: The higher the ISO speed, the more noisy the results are so its best to keep this as low as possible (but of course it is a trade off because if your shutter speed is too slow, the picture will be blurry). The same considerations apply if you are shooting within a woodland. So, to sum up: Pros: Good value for money (a lot cheaper than a DSLR) Lightweight, portable, great zoom and macro capability - no need to change lenses so you can shoot birds, insects and landscapes all in one session. easy to use with lots of good features and manual controls to play around with. Movie mode. Good image quality in good light. Low maintenance. Cons: noisy sensors meaning poorer image quality in overcast/shaded conditions. Not so great for birds in flight (not responsive enough). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Tips For New Birders
What kind of camera would I need?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top