What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Tips For New Birders
What kind of camera would I need?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jim M." data-source="post: 1223187" data-attributes="member: 60675"><p>I am glad you have a camera that works for you, but have you tried the latest generation of superzooms, such as the FZ18? I do not think you can lump all point-and-shoot cameras together. In burst mode, you can shoot 4-7 shots per second, which is all I ever would have a need for. Changing many settings is easy, but I find I really rarely have the need to do so. Moreover, as I have said before, you can make all the generalizations you want about image quality, but when I look at actual photos I do not see much difference between the output of DSLR's and the more advanced ultra zooms.</p><p></p><p>If you do not mind the extra weight and bulk of a DSLR and a telephoto lens then by all means go that route. But if you prefer something lighter (or less expensive -- though that was not a concern in my case), I think the superzooms are a great option that can also produce high quality shots-- and certainly better shots than from a camera that is such a bother that you leave it behind in the car or that has the wrong lens attached when a great bird photo opportunity arises. I will attach my recent shots of a Gray Jay and Double-crested Cormorants as further examples of the many posted on these forums of FZ18 output. And I only consider myself to be a casual photographer; someone more dedicated (and better with post-processing) should be able to improve on these. Here is a link to some additional samples of mine: <a href="http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?p=1130683#post1130683" target="_blank">http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?p=1130683#post1130683</a></p><p></p><p>I think if you mixed these types of shots together with typical DSLR shots from non-professionals, few people would be able to tell which camera took which shots. I also see you have a few shots in your gallery (<a href="http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/54010" target="_blank">http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/54010</a>); they look very nice, but I do not see a major difference in image quality that would be attributable to different cameras taking different shots.</p><p></p><p>Best,</p><p>Jim</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jim M., post: 1223187, member: 60675"] I am glad you have a camera that works for you, but have you tried the latest generation of superzooms, such as the FZ18? I do not think you can lump all point-and-shoot cameras together. In burst mode, you can shoot 4-7 shots per second, which is all I ever would have a need for. Changing many settings is easy, but I find I really rarely have the need to do so. Moreover, as I have said before, you can make all the generalizations you want about image quality, but when I look at actual photos I do not see much difference between the output of DSLR's and the more advanced ultra zooms. If you do not mind the extra weight and bulk of a DSLR and a telephoto lens then by all means go that route. But if you prefer something lighter (or less expensive -- though that was not a concern in my case), I think the superzooms are a great option that can also produce high quality shots-- and certainly better shots than from a camera that is such a bother that you leave it behind in the car or that has the wrong lens attached when a great bird photo opportunity arises. I will attach my recent shots of a Gray Jay and Double-crested Cormorants as further examples of the many posted on these forums of FZ18 output. And I only consider myself to be a casual photographer; someone more dedicated (and better with post-processing) should be able to improve on these. Here is a link to some additional samples of mine: [URL]http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?p=1130683#post1130683[/URL] I think if you mixed these types of shots together with typical DSLR shots from non-professionals, few people would be able to tell which camera took which shots. I also see you have a few shots in your gallery ([URL]http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/54010[/URL]); they look very nice, but I do not see a major difference in image quality that would be attributable to different cameras taking different shots. Best, Jim [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Tips For New Birders
What kind of camera would I need?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top