What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
What Makes a Set of Binos Cost $2,500 ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adhoc" data-source="post: 3563126" data-attributes="member: 131373"><p>Jgraider, thanks for the comments. It seems to me, though, that there is not much of a contadiction here. For the difference to show up well, I had in mind more of a price, and co-relating to that a quality, difference, than between the instruments you mention. The OP cites the Zeiss SF vs the Zeiss Terra.</p><p></p><p>Also, Alexis Powell's idea that I quote has the words "tends to", and to that I add "(generally)", so it does not cover every case of an individual user and his/her experience with a particular very-high-priced binocular and a particular much-lower-priced one. As they say, exceptions excepted!</p><p></p><p>I am interested to know if your experience with the Toric, Conquest and Gold Ring is that they are not relaxing, i.e. difficult to look through for long periods, or not notably relaxing, in order to have an idea of how you find the Swaro EL 10x50 in that respect. As I remember at least one person on the forum said that he was using it as his main glass, in which case the view should be easy on his eyes. Going by such reports here I have recommended the model to a friend, who may already be moving in the matter! </p><p></p><p>My critical experience of scopes is zero, as I much prefer not to look with only one eye! (From time to time friends press me to look through their scopes, ranging from pretty basic to "alpha", at some detail of a distant bird, but I quickly peep and recoil.) I would be surprised to hear what you say about that Zeiss scope if it is one of their top-tier models in optical quality. If, however, it corresponds to their 3rd tier in binoculars, the Terra, then it is not up there at the level of quality I had in mind in my last post. (Sorry I am ignorant about the model.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adhoc, post: 3563126, member: 131373"] Jgraider, thanks for the comments. It seems to me, though, that there is not much of a contadiction here. For the difference to show up well, I had in mind more of a price, and co-relating to that a quality, difference, than between the instruments you mention. The OP cites the Zeiss SF vs the Zeiss Terra. Also, Alexis Powell's idea that I quote has the words "tends to", and to that I add "(generally)", so it does not cover every case of an individual user and his/her experience with a particular very-high-priced binocular and a particular much-lower-priced one. As they say, exceptions excepted! I am interested to know if your experience with the Toric, Conquest and Gold Ring is that they are not relaxing, i.e. difficult to look through for long periods, or not notably relaxing, in order to have an idea of how you find the Swaro EL 10x50 in that respect. As I remember at least one person on the forum said that he was using it as his main glass, in which case the view should be easy on his eyes. Going by such reports here I have recommended the model to a friend, who may already be moving in the matter! My critical experience of scopes is zero, as I much prefer not to look with only one eye! (From time to time friends press me to look through their scopes, ranging from pretty basic to "alpha", at some detail of a distant bird, but I quickly peep and recoil.) I would be surprised to hear what you say about that Zeiss scope if it is one of their top-tier models in optical quality. If, however, it corresponds to their 3rd tier in binoculars, the Terra, then it is not up there at the level of quality I had in mind in my last post. (Sorry I am ignorant about the model.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
What Makes a Set of Binos Cost $2,500 ???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top