What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Whats' the best WATERPROOF porro?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jaymoynihan" data-source="post: 1569815" data-attributes="member: 50493"><p>You kind of hit the difference (optically) between the 2 in your question. Apart from the lack of any noticable CA of course in the Swift. The center resolution in both is of course excellent, probably with a tiny tip of the hat to the Swift (given the aperture difference, there should be)<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>But the Swift image quality does comparatively, degrade outward from the center, as in most binos. </p><p></p><p>I know, physics being what it is, that must be true of the Nikons also, but I do not see it in normal use, and I cannot see it if i look for it, until you get about 5% from the edge. </p><p></p><p>In the Swift, you do not notice it in actual "use" (if you are actually visually concentrating on the creature <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> ) but it is easy to see when you look for it. </p><p></p><p>Yes, the 8x32 SE is kind of a magic glass. :t: Pity they stopped production. Wish i had salted away a spare pair.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jaymoynihan, post: 1569815, member: 50493"] You kind of hit the difference (optically) between the 2 in your question. Apart from the lack of any noticable CA of course in the Swift. The center resolution in both is of course excellent, probably with a tiny tip of the hat to the Swift (given the aperture difference, there should be);) But the Swift image quality does comparatively, degrade outward from the center, as in most binos. I know, physics being what it is, that must be true of the Nikons also, but I do not see it in normal use, and I cannot see it if i look for it, until you get about 5% from the edge. In the Swift, you do not notice it in actual "use" (if you are actually visually concentrating on the creature ;) ) but it is easy to see when you look for it. Yes, the 8x32 SE is kind of a magic glass. :t: Pity they stopped production. Wish i had salted away a spare pair. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Whats' the best WATERPROOF porro?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top