What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
What's your best 2009 new Binoculars?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 1687552" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>Steve,</p><p></p><p>At $899, the 8x30 SLC is low in snob appeal, big in hunter appeal. From reading hunting bin forums, I find much less concern about a bin's logo's "cachet in the field" than I than do its utility. </p><p></p><p>Besides, no-one would ever call you a snob. Frugal, perhaps, but not a snob. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>To clarify, I did not mean to imply that every birder buys alphas because of their snob appeal. Most would probably be happy to own an alpha with a missing logo or nameplate because of their excellent optics, build, warranty, and ability to endure the test of time. </p><p></p><p>For avid birders and hunters with deep pockets, alphas represent a long-term investment, perhaps even a lifetime investment. </p><p></p><p>But there is a small group of birders who would shun a Chinese bin or a Japanese bin even if they found it to be on par with an alpha simply because it's not European made. </p><p></p><p>Or even choose one alpha over another even if they thought the competing brand had better optics, because the "red dot has more cachet in the field". (my favorite quote of all time <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Some car buyers are the same way. Even if a Japanese or an American luxury or sports car outperforms, is more fuel efficient, or is more reliable than a competing European model, they will always choose the "Euro sedan or sports car" simply because of the "class" associated with it. European luxury car companies exploit that appeal in their ads and commercials.</p><p></p><p>But my point was that even as Chinese and Japanese bins come closer to the alphas (or in the case of the EDG, equal them), there will always be a market for Euro-made alpha bins, regardless of price or how competitive Chinese and Japanese optics become. </p><p></p><p>Not only because of "snob appeal," which I don't think by itself can sustain those companies, but mainly because of their long-standing reputation for excellence and endurance. </p><p></p><p>Although I have previously called for Leica to offer a second tier line of bins at the $1,200 price point like Zeiss, Swaro, and Nikon, now I see no point in it. </p><p></p><p>Leica's exclusivity and price point are an important part of its marketing strategy. </p><p></p><p>Btw, I agree with you about the ZR's focuser and diopter (both too stiff) and the glare/flare issue (which is supposed to be fixed on the new version), and while I would rather buy a Nikon 7x42 EDG, I think I can live with the stiff focuser and diopter on the ZR 7x36 ED2 MKII <em>for $1,600 less</em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 1687552, member: 665"] Steve, At $899, the 8x30 SLC is low in snob appeal, big in hunter appeal. From reading hunting bin forums, I find much less concern about a bin's logo's "cachet in the field" than I than do its utility. Besides, no-one would ever call you a snob. Frugal, perhaps, but not a snob. :-) To clarify, I did not mean to imply that every birder buys alphas because of their snob appeal. Most would probably be happy to own an alpha with a missing logo or nameplate because of their excellent optics, build, warranty, and ability to endure the test of time. For avid birders and hunters with deep pockets, alphas represent a long-term investment, perhaps even a lifetime investment. But there is a small group of birders who would shun a Chinese bin or a Japanese bin even if they found it to be on par with an alpha simply because it's not European made. Or even choose one alpha over another even if they thought the competing brand had better optics, because the "red dot has more cachet in the field". (my favorite quote of all time :-) Some car buyers are the same way. Even if a Japanese or an American luxury or sports car outperforms, is more fuel efficient, or is more reliable than a competing European model, they will always choose the "Euro sedan or sports car" simply because of the "class" associated with it. European luxury car companies exploit that appeal in their ads and commercials. But my point was that even as Chinese and Japanese bins come closer to the alphas (or in the case of the EDG, equal them), there will always be a market for Euro-made alpha bins, regardless of price or how competitive Chinese and Japanese optics become. Not only because of "snob appeal," which I don't think by itself can sustain those companies, but mainly because of their long-standing reputation for excellence and endurance. Although I have previously called for Leica to offer a second tier line of bins at the $1,200 price point like Zeiss, Swaro, and Nikon, now I see no point in it. Leica's exclusivity and price point are an important part of its marketing strategy. Btw, I agree with you about the ZR's focuser and diopter (both too stiff) and the glare/flare issue (which is supposed to be fixed on the new version), and while I would rather buy a Nikon 7x42 EDG, I think I can live with the stiff focuser and diopter on the ZR 7x36 ED2 MKII [I]for $1,600 less[/I]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
What's your best 2009 new Binoculars?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top