What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
When a Leica Ultravid HD+ Replacement?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Subzero888" data-source="post: 3395821" data-attributes="member: 106586"><p>You are right about ergonomics being a matter of taste. I use the UV HD 10x42 and my opinion is the opposite of yours. The UV is perfect to hold. The large diopter knob right next to the focus knob makes the surface area big and easy to work with two index fingers, even with gloves. I use both my index fingers pulling/pushing at the same time to focus. The compact size of the UV makes it a delight to hold. The thumb horns on the bottom work great for me. The left thumb goes under the horn close to the eyepiece and the right thumb over the horn away from the eyepiece making it a stable platform for comfortable viewing. IMO the UV looks and build are better than the SV. The SV 8.5x42 I tried was bigger than the UV 10x42 and the small gap between the barrels made it uncomfortable to wrap my fingers around them. On this point the SF beats the SV handily. The SF is such a joy to hold and handle with superior balance, but the fit and finish were not up to par of SV or UV. I found that the SV 8x32 with narrower barrels makes the gap between them larger and is comfortable to hold and view.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Subzero888, post: 3395821, member: 106586"] You are right about ergonomics being a matter of taste. I use the UV HD 10x42 and my opinion is the opposite of yours. The UV is perfect to hold. The large diopter knob right next to the focus knob makes the surface area big and easy to work with two index fingers, even with gloves. I use both my index fingers pulling/pushing at the same time to focus. The compact size of the UV makes it a delight to hold. The thumb horns on the bottom work great for me. The left thumb goes under the horn close to the eyepiece and the right thumb over the horn away from the eyepiece making it a stable platform for comfortable viewing. IMO the UV looks and build are better than the SV. The SV 8.5x42 I tried was bigger than the UV 10x42 and the small gap between the barrels made it uncomfortable to wrap my fingers around them. On this point the SF beats the SV handily. The SF is such a joy to hold and handle with superior balance, but the fit and finish were not up to par of SV or UV. I found that the SV 8x32 with narrower barrels makes the gap between them larger and is comfortable to hold and view. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
When a Leica Ultravid HD+ Replacement?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top