Which bino? (1 Viewer)

[PetterSwe]

Hi
I am looking for binoculars for primary use when hunting (both stalking and sitting on a stand, often in varying light and weather conditions), but also observing wildlife when out in the nature. I live in Sweden.

I consider a Zeiss Victory FL in 8x42 from 2011 that I can buy second hand online, supposedly in good condition, for €800 ($900). Alternative is brand new Conquest HD at €970 ($1100) or Vortex Viper HD at €480 ($540).

originally my budget was about €600 and I found the Viper HD on winter sale, but after reading this forum and learning more I’m starting to wander if I shouldn’t go for a better bino when I make a purchase.

any advice? If I chose to spend more than my budget, is the used FL better value for money than brand new Conquest HD?

thx in advance

 

[Robert Moore]

I personally would rather have a used FL than a new Conquest. The Conquest is good also but for the same money I think I would go for the FL.

 

[Ratal]

FL. The 2011 version is a beast.

 

[KC Foggin]

I'm just going to jump in here and wish you a warm welcome to you from those of us on staff here at BirdForum
We're glad you found us and please join in wherever you like

 

[qwerty5]

Certainly buy the FL if you have the money. Higher price equals higher performance in optics.

 

[Rg548]

The other point is the FL will stay at that value, or even increase, but the Conquest value will drop to second hand value as soon as it is bought.
FL is better, but I am a huge fan of conquests, possibly the best value for money out there for a 'new' purchase in my opinion.

 

[jring]

Hi Petter,

first of all, welcome to BF!

Another vote for the used alpha in the form of the Zeiss FL.

Joachim

 

[Troubador]

Hej Petter
I also support the choice of used FL 8x42 .

Hej da
Lee