What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Which bins?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dustyview" data-source="post: 1483092" data-attributes="member: 76316"><p>Ron and Kevin: It's not so much that I liked the Nikons better, I was just surprised at how well they compared. FOV was narrower and the image less bright w/ the Nikons (of course), but they definitely cut the haze better than the old Leicas. As I noted before, image quality was sharper overall w/ the Leicas.</p><p></p><p>I have enjoyed reading through many of the posts on the bin forum here on birdforum over the last month or two (just recently discovered the place). I always wonder, though, in some of these comparisons, how much of a role is played by small sample size. For instance, my old Venturer IIs may be an exceptionally good pair. Also, I recently ordered two closeout pairs of the Vortex Hurricane for knock-around glasses. The 8x are fine for what I need them for. The seem well-made, are waterproof, have good eye relief (I use binoculars with and without glasses), have nice bright images, etc. (also some flare, finicky eye position issues, etc, so not perfect, but overall very useable). The 10x, however, wouldn't even focus, with or without glasses -- probably some internal alignment problem. So, almost the same binocular, presumably same factory, but two very different examples. It's possible that the Leicas we tested against the Nikons may have been banged around or had some other issues.</p><p></p><p>Ron, if you really want to get rid of your travelites there is a magnate school with an ecology/environmental focus here in UT where our lab recently did a microscopy presentation and I know they are looking for all kinds of optical gear for student use. I'd be happy to take them, check them out, and get them to the school. Even if they aren't great, they would be appreciated, I think. (also a good excuse for me to drive up and see if there are any lingering Sandhills... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> ) I'll PM you.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: Kevin, do you know whether the Prostaffs an optically improved Travelite, or just the same optics in a water-resistant housing?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dustyview, post: 1483092, member: 76316"] Ron and Kevin: It's not so much that I liked the Nikons better, I was just surprised at how well they compared. FOV was narrower and the image less bright w/ the Nikons (of course), but they definitely cut the haze better than the old Leicas. As I noted before, image quality was sharper overall w/ the Leicas. I have enjoyed reading through many of the posts on the bin forum here on birdforum over the last month or two (just recently discovered the place). I always wonder, though, in some of these comparisons, how much of a role is played by small sample size. For instance, my old Venturer IIs may be an exceptionally good pair. Also, I recently ordered two closeout pairs of the Vortex Hurricane for knock-around glasses. The 8x are fine for what I need them for. The seem well-made, are waterproof, have good eye relief (I use binoculars with and without glasses), have nice bright images, etc. (also some flare, finicky eye position issues, etc, so not perfect, but overall very useable). The 10x, however, wouldn't even focus, with or without glasses -- probably some internal alignment problem. So, almost the same binocular, presumably same factory, but two very different examples. It's possible that the Leicas we tested against the Nikons may have been banged around or had some other issues. Ron, if you really want to get rid of your travelites there is a magnate school with an ecology/environmental focus here in UT where our lab recently did a microscopy presentation and I know they are looking for all kinds of optical gear for student use. I'd be happy to take them, check them out, and get them to the school. Even if they aren't great, they would be appreciated, I think. (also a good excuse for me to drive up and see if there are any lingering Sandhills... ;) ) I'll PM you. EDIT: Kevin, do you know whether the Prostaffs an optically improved Travelite, or just the same optics in a water-resistant housing? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Which bins?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top