What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Which camp are you in!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LabradorDuck" data-source="post: 1673599" data-attributes="member: 80696"><p>If the bird appears healthy, it should be left alone regardless of how "out of place" it is. It may well survive, as others in this thread have said. Birds injured due to human activities should be rescued (if our activities are "natural," so is our choice to help minimize their impacts). </p><p></p><p>It becomes more tricky if a bird is sick or injured due to purely natural causes. Restoring its health and releasing it could encourage the same risky behavior (would a bird who almost froze to death from not migrating teach its offspring to migrate?), but an organization keeping it for public education, as they do with e.g. raptors who can't be released could be seen as beneficial. The point about scavenging species depending on natural winter-killed food is important, though. Of course, for a threatened or endangered species, it might be best to err on the side of keeping a wider gene pool alive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LabradorDuck, post: 1673599, member: 80696"] If the bird appears healthy, it should be left alone regardless of how "out of place" it is. It may well survive, as others in this thread have said. Birds injured due to human activities should be rescued (if our activities are "natural," so is our choice to help minimize their impacts). It becomes more tricky if a bird is sick or injured due to purely natural causes. Restoring its health and releasing it could encourage the same risky behavior (would a bird who almost froze to death from not migrating teach its offspring to migrate?), but an organization keeping it for public education, as they do with e.g. raptors who can't be released could be seen as beneficial. The point about scavenging species depending on natural winter-killed food is important, though. Of course, for a threatened or endangered species, it might be best to err on the side of keeping a wider gene pool alive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Which camp are you in!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top