What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Which control glare better porro's or roof's?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OPTIC_NUT" data-source="post: 3223666" data-attributes="member: 121951"><p>Looking at this from common ground:</p><p></p><p>I will say....I do agree and understand how</p><p>having excess exit pupil allows the eye to cut the 'rind off the orange',</p><p>throwing away the veiling glare the the prism artifacts, etc. You are</p><p>stopping down the entire path with your eye.</p><p></p><p>However, there are many binoculars, especially in the misty past</p><p>of Japan, that gladly tossed the junk out before it got to your eyes.</p><p>Your eyes are by no means the only thing that can cut off that trash.</p><p>There are many opportunities to do so in the gadget. It involves sacrificing light</p><p>to achieve contrast, and I support that choice over the blind craving</p><p>for transmission alone. It may be that I am discussing a world of baffling</p><p>I have seen many times and you rarely see.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure, but it seems you must admit there are better and worse binoculars</p><p>for this glare at the same power and aperture. Some designs miss the mark by a lot,</p><p>some by a little. If you don't own many variants at the same PxA, try a big shop's counters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OPTIC_NUT, post: 3223666, member: 121951"] Looking at this from common ground: I will say....I do agree and understand how having excess exit pupil allows the eye to cut the 'rind off the orange', throwing away the veiling glare the the prism artifacts, etc. You are stopping down the entire path with your eye. However, there are many binoculars, especially in the misty past of Japan, that gladly tossed the junk out before it got to your eyes. Your eyes are by no means the only thing that can cut off that trash. There are many opportunities to do so in the gadget. It involves sacrificing light to achieve contrast, and I support that choice over the blind craving for transmission alone. It may be that I am discussing a world of baffling I have seen many times and you rarely see. I'm not sure, but it seems you must admit there are better and worse binoculars for this glare at the same power and aperture. Some designs miss the mark by a lot, some by a little. If you don't own many variants at the same PxA, try a big shop's counters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Which control glare better porro's or roof's?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top