What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Which software is better?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Keith Reeder" data-source="post: 1146254" data-attributes="member: 4913"><p>Hi Brian,</p><p></p><p>I'm with you about Canon's DPP: it's a capable RAW converter, but I don't like it. It doesn't have highlight recovery either, which I regard as an essential.</p><p></p><p>But it <em>does</em> do a good job of converting RAW files.</p><p></p><p>Elements isn't really dedicated to that task, and I wouldn't use it with RAWs myself (I'm not even sure it <em>can</em> <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=26832780" target="_blank">save RAW to jpeg</a>).</p><p></p><p>Personally I'm happier keeping RAW conversion and subsequent "cosmetic" editing separate. </p><p></p><p>Elements is good for the latter, though I far prefer Paint Shop Pro myself, as it comes with some functions I won't be without (not least the "Focus" sharpening tool, which is better - IMHO - than <em>any</em> other sharpening tool readily available, including those in Photoshop CS3).</p><p></p><p>So my - <em>ahem!</em> - "workflow" is:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">RAW to jpeg plus adjustments to exposure, shadows/highlights, colo(u)r boost, and very light anti-AA sharpening in <a href="http://www.rawtherapee.com" target="_blank">Raw Therapee</a>; </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">cropping, resizing, Curves/Levels (though I could do these in Raw Therapee) and any other tweaking in Paint Shop Pro.</li> </ul><p>I use the same camera and lens as you - the 40D + 100-400mm (<em>hey, ah'm from Soo' Sheels an' aal!</em>) - and I'm <em>very</em> happy with results...</p><p></p><p>I should mention that Raw Therapee is free - and, honest to God, as good as it gets - and Paint Shop Pro gives you much more for the money than Elements.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Keith Reeder, post: 1146254, member: 4913"] Hi Brian, I'm with you about Canon's DPP: it's a capable RAW converter, but I don't like it. It doesn't have highlight recovery either, which I regard as an essential. But it [i]does[/i] do a good job of converting RAW files. Elements isn't really dedicated to that task, and I wouldn't use it with RAWs myself (I'm not even sure it [i]can[/i] [URL="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=26832780"]save RAW to jpeg[/URL]). Personally I'm happier keeping RAW conversion and subsequent "cosmetic" editing separate. Elements is good for the latter, though I far prefer Paint Shop Pro myself, as it comes with some functions I won't be without (not least the "Focus" sharpening tool, which is better - IMHO - than [i]any[/i] other sharpening tool readily available, including those in Photoshop CS3). So my - [i]ahem![/i] - "workflow" is: [LIST] [*]RAW to jpeg plus adjustments to exposure, shadows/highlights, colo(u)r boost, and very light anti-AA sharpening in [URL="http://www.rawtherapee.com"]Raw Therapee[/URL]; [*]cropping, resizing, Curves/Levels (though I could do these in Raw Therapee) and any other tweaking in Paint Shop Pro. [/LIST] I use the same camera and lens as you - the 40D + 100-400mm ([i]hey, ah'm from Soo' Sheels an' aal![/i]) - and I'm [i]very[/i] happy with results... I should mention that Raw Therapee is free - and, honest to God, as good as it gets - and Paint Shop Pro gives you much more for the money than Elements. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Which software is better?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top