What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Which tele-converter with Nikon 300mm f.4: TC14E or TC17E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gentoo" data-source="post: 1207822" data-attributes="member: 35131"><p>One thing to note is that the D300 is less grainy at higher ISO's but it sacrifices sharpness.</p><p></p><p> click the link to see photo comparisons of the above.</p><p></p><p>I have been thinking about a D300 myself but haven't made up my mind yet. Currently, I'm still shooting with a D40 and just got the 70mm-300mm Nikkor with VR. Thing is, this lens was made for a normal film 35mm camera so the smaller sensor size on these Nikon digitals means that you have an apparent zoom of 105mm-420mm, a 1.5 conversion factor. Plus I slapped that kenko pro 300 1.4 teleconverter on it so I get the equivalent of 580mm or whatever plus VR for hand held shots. The VR allows you to step down further in F stops and performs better in low light than non VR does.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gentoo, post: 1207822, member: 35131"] One thing to note is that the D300 is less grainy at higher ISO's but it sacrifices sharpness. click the link to see photo comparisons of the above. I have been thinking about a D300 myself but haven't made up my mind yet. Currently, I'm still shooting with a D40 and just got the 70mm-300mm Nikkor with VR. Thing is, this lens was made for a normal film 35mm camera so the smaller sensor size on these Nikon digitals means that you have an apparent zoom of 105mm-420mm, a 1.5 conversion factor. Plus I slapped that kenko pro 300 1.4 teleconverter on it so I get the equivalent of 580mm or whatever plus VR for hand held shots. The VR allows you to step down further in F stops and performs better in low light than non VR does. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Which tele-converter with Nikon 300mm f.4: TC14E or TC17E?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top