What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why couldn't a catadioptric or newtonian optical system be used in binoculars?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WJC" data-source="post: 3160291" data-attributes="member: 25191"><p>Etudiant:</p><p></p><p>It's pretty obvious that you're an intelligent person. So, I must ask: are you playing head games with me?</p><p></p><p>On this forum, we see folks wanting to get more from every optical system than most of them could ever provide. Do you suppose that when you TILT that system the aberrations stay the same? And correcting those aberrations would require additional elements--$$$, some of which would have to be TILTED, themselves.</p><p></p><p>Zeiss produced the first prismatic binocular in 1894 (121 years ago). In those years, there have been some brilliant people working to better the design. I am always glad when that happens. But, most of the new and wonderful (perceived) things that people have come up with have been gimmicks to take advantage of consumers: Zooms, Rudy coatings, Zip Focusers, click-stop focusers, electronic focusers, screw-up eyecups, built-in cameras, etc.</p><p></p><p>I don't want anyone to ever think I expect my word to be the last on any issue. But, I just want to give the quiet lurker something to think about. There's just too many people who like to walk the tracks without their hearing aids. :eek!:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WJC, post: 3160291, member: 25191"] Etudiant: It's pretty obvious that you're an intelligent person. So, I must ask: are you playing head games with me? On this forum, we see folks wanting to get more from every optical system than most of them could ever provide. Do you suppose that when you TILT that system the aberrations stay the same? And correcting those aberrations would require additional elements--$$$, some of which would have to be TILTED, themselves. Zeiss produced the first prismatic binocular in 1894 (121 years ago). In those years, there have been some brilliant people working to better the design. I am always glad when that happens. But, most of the new and wonderful (perceived) things that people have come up with have been gimmicks to take advantage of consumers: Zooms, Rudy coatings, Zip Focusers, click-stop focusers, electronic focusers, screw-up eyecups, built-in cameras, etc. I don't want anyone to ever think I expect my word to be the last on any issue. But, I just want to give the quiet lurker something to think about. There's just too many people who like to walk the tracks without their hearing aids. :eek!: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why couldn't a catadioptric or newtonian optical system be used in binoculars?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top