What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why couldn't a catadioptric or newtonian optical system be used in binoculars?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3160539" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>. There are very large telescopes with very fast primary mirrors. Such as 8 m or 300 inch F/1. Others of F/1.25.</p><p>And designs for a 30 m telescope with an F/0.5 primary. Correctors are used.</p><p>The primaries are usually spherical.</p><p>The common low-priced Schmidt Cassegrains use F/2 mirrors.</p><p>there is nothing very difficult about making fast mirrors if the design requires it.</p><p></p><p>I also had a very strange Philips mirror system which seems to have perhaps an F/1 primary and you looked at it from the side. I never did find out what it was.</p><p></p><p>I have a Sigma 500 mm F/4 mirror lens, which is complex. It only works at one focusing distance. If you focus away from this point the image becomes progressively worse. I do not know how fast the primary mirror is on this.</p><p>There is also the Nikon 500 mm F/5 and I think the Zeiss 500 mm F/4.5. Again I don't know how fast the primaries are.</p><p>As has been said above the secondary obstructions are large and the contrast low.</p><p>The Minolta 250 mm F/5 .6 lens is very small and quite useful, but again the contrast is not very good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3160539, member: 111403"] . There are very large telescopes with very fast primary mirrors. Such as 8 m or 300 inch F/1. Others of F/1.25. And designs for a 30 m telescope with an F/0.5 primary. Correctors are used. The primaries are usually spherical. The common low-priced Schmidt Cassegrains use F/2 mirrors. there is nothing very difficult about making fast mirrors if the design requires it. I also had a very strange Philips mirror system which seems to have perhaps an F/1 primary and you looked at it from the side. I never did find out what it was. I have a Sigma 500 mm F/4 mirror lens, which is complex. It only works at one focusing distance. If you focus away from this point the image becomes progressively worse. I do not know how fast the primary mirror is on this. There is also the Nikon 500 mm F/5 and I think the Zeiss 500 mm F/4.5. Again I don't know how fast the primaries are. As has been said above the secondary obstructions are large and the contrast low. The Minolta 250 mm F/5 .6 lens is very small and quite useful, but again the contrast is not very good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why couldn't a catadioptric or newtonian optical system be used in binoculars?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top