What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why couldn't a catadioptric or newtonian optical system be used in binoculars?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="etudiant" data-source="post: 3160719" data-attributes="member: 48052"><p>Those big light buckets have to be fast, else the secondary sticks out into the stratosphere. Even so, just putting up their surrounding dome is an engineering challenge, especially as they are usually sited far from any industrial base.</p><p>I might add that pretty much all of the 8 meter plus telescopes now use active optics, many even on the primary, which does improve their performance, but at a considerable cost.</p><p></p><p>Seen that the binocular community is too conservative even to embrace Image Stabilization, despite its obvious huge benefit, it seems silly to be floating alternative optical schemes that offer little except added expense.</p><p>I will now retreat to my foxhole.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="etudiant, post: 3160719, member: 48052"] Those big light buckets have to be fast, else the secondary sticks out into the stratosphere. Even so, just putting up their surrounding dome is an engineering challenge, especially as they are usually sited far from any industrial base. I might add that pretty much all of the 8 meter plus telescopes now use active optics, many even on the primary, which does improve their performance, but at a considerable cost. Seen that the binocular community is too conservative even to embrace Image Stabilization, despite its obvious huge benefit, it seems silly to be floating alternative optical schemes that offer little except added expense. I will now retreat to my foxhole. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why couldn't a catadioptric or newtonian optical system be used in binoculars?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top