What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why do midrange binoculars exist?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="peatmoss" data-source="post: 3324697" data-attributes="member: 119647"><p>Tenex, thanks for the binocular review. Reviews from diverse users are important because everyone reacts differently to binoculars, and so it's always healthy to have more viewpoints available. More data points, that's all. The wobbly diopter is likely either a QC issue or maybe just plain wear-and-tear. These are, after all, demo models that may have been used by others before you. Either way, this unit ought to go back to the company asap. As far as the glare, some users have reported the issue with the Kite and Nikon variants, so it's interesting to hear it mentioned in regard to this version too.</p><p></p><p>I can also appreciate your frustration with these problems especially in light of the marketing employed by the company. However, frustrating as it is, that's no reason to dismiss the entire sub-alpha binocular world. There's plenty of excellent binoculars at all price points. But you won't find any "perfect" binoculars here. So it's just a matter of finding the right binocular within your budget whose faults don't bug you too much. I suppose one lesson you learned here is how important glare control is for you. </p><p></p><p>Etudiant, if you want to create a special category for Swaro, go right ahead. But I don't see why you've chosen to nominate Nikon as the poster-boy for "these in between suppliers" who "are not sufficiently long standing to be credible long term guarantors." Nikon has been selling binoculars for decades, and I've got decades old Nippon Kogaku binoculars that I'm happy to use today. Are these still under warranty? Of course not. That was never part of the deal. But I for one am quite confident that Nikon will be around for a long time to come, and that they will honor the terms of any warranty that they give today.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="peatmoss, post: 3324697, member: 119647"] Tenex, thanks for the binocular review. Reviews from diverse users are important because everyone reacts differently to binoculars, and so it's always healthy to have more viewpoints available. More data points, that's all. The wobbly diopter is likely either a QC issue or maybe just plain wear-and-tear. These are, after all, demo models that may have been used by others before you. Either way, this unit ought to go back to the company asap. As far as the glare, some users have reported the issue with the Kite and Nikon variants, so it's interesting to hear it mentioned in regard to this version too. I can also appreciate your frustration with these problems especially in light of the marketing employed by the company. However, frustrating as it is, that's no reason to dismiss the entire sub-alpha binocular world. There's plenty of excellent binoculars at all price points. But you won't find any "perfect" binoculars here. So it's just a matter of finding the right binocular within your budget whose faults don't bug you too much. I suppose one lesson you learned here is how important glare control is for you. Etudiant, if you want to create a special category for Swaro, go right ahead. But I don't see why you've chosen to nominate Nikon as the poster-boy for "these in between suppliers" who "are not sufficiently long standing to be credible long term guarantors." Nikon has been selling binoculars for decades, and I've got decades old Nippon Kogaku binoculars that I'm happy to use today. Are these still under warranty? Of course not. That was never part of the deal. But I for one am quite confident that Nikon will be around for a long time to come, and that they will honor the terms of any warranty that they give today. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why do midrange binoculars exist?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top