What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why No More High End Porros?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tenex" data-source="post: 3657496" data-attributes="member: 135233"><p>I tried a Habicht 10x40 once (courtesy of Eagle Optics, RIP) and was very surprised that I couldn't like it. It felt stiff and awkward, somehow less vivid than the roof-prism competition (possibly glare?), and had a stingy sweet spot. (I suppose trying to waterproof a CF Porro does make it stiff, and I do need CF, so forget Fujinon etc.) Also a Nikon SE 10x42, no longer made; it seemed nice but just didn't win me over. Even Docter/Jena doesn't make Porros anymore, and those (like most) were seriously heavy. Perhaps Porros would seem more competitive if the same R&D effort had continued to be put into them for decades, but that didn't happen.</p><p></p><p>I do think there could still be a market for special editions. Sometime in the 1980s Zeiss did one with their 10x50 Porro; I don't know whether it had improved coatings, probably not oculars (which it badly needed). In the 90s they actually reissued the 15x60 with improved, larger oculars. I'd like to see more of this done today myself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tenex, post: 3657496, member: 135233"] I tried a Habicht 10x40 once (courtesy of Eagle Optics, RIP) and was very surprised that I couldn't like it. It felt stiff and awkward, somehow less vivid than the roof-prism competition (possibly glare?), and had a stingy sweet spot. (I suppose trying to waterproof a CF Porro does make it stiff, and I do need CF, so forget Fujinon etc.) Also a Nikon SE 10x42, no longer made; it seemed nice but just didn't win me over. Even Docter/Jena doesn't make Porros anymore, and those (like most) were seriously heavy. Perhaps Porros would seem more competitive if the same R&D effort had continued to be put into them for decades, but that didn't happen. I do think there could still be a market for special editions. Sometime in the 1980s Zeiss did one with their 10x50 Porro; I don't know whether it had improved coatings, probably not oculars (which it badly needed). In the 90s they actually reissued the 15x60 with improved, larger oculars. I'd like to see more of this done today myself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Why No More High End Porros?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top