What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
Why Shooting Times rejected RSPB hotline advert
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Farnboro John" data-source="post: 1435159" data-attributes="member: 36432"><p>Actually I kind of get where he's going with that. If you buy meat from a shop you are still participating in the death of an animal (so if you are not a vegetarian, you have no argument against shooting for food. At all. Get used to it.) Shooters (assuming they either eat it themselves or sell it for meat) do that in an open, honest way.</p><p></p><p>However: we all have serious issues with dishonest aspects of the shooting thing: and for the Shooting Times to refuse to run the RSPB advert is to (a) stick their heads in the sand and (b) refuse to participate responsibly in a society in which individuals and organisations are encouraged to do so, with neighbourhood watches, PCSOs, etc. Not a great move by them and no decent justification for what is essentially an indefensible stand.</p><p></p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Farnboro John, post: 1435159, member: 36432"] Actually I kind of get where he's going with that. If you buy meat from a shop you are still participating in the death of an animal (so if you are not a vegetarian, you have no argument against shooting for food. At all. Get used to it.) Shooters (assuming they either eat it themselves or sell it for meat) do that in an open, honest way. However: we all have serious issues with dishonest aspects of the shooting thing: and for the Shooting Times to refuse to run the RSPB advert is to (a) stick their heads in the sand and (b) refuse to participate responsibly in a society in which individuals and organisations are encouraged to do so, with neighbourhood watches, PCSOs, etc. Not a great move by them and no decent justification for what is essentially an indefensible stand. John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
Why Shooting Times rejected RSPB hotline advert
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top