What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Why would you buy a Zeiss HT over an SF?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henry link" data-source="post: 3347206" data-attributes="member: 6806"><p>I totally agree about Zeiss marketing. They seem to supply ever less useful information.</p><p></p><p>I've looked through everything I could find and still don't know what "Ultra-FL" means, but I'm sure it doesn't have anything to do with the HTultra glass types, which are just more recent HT glasses with even higher transmission (I think mainly in the UV). None of the HT or HTultras are FL types.</p><p></p><p>Ultra-FL lenses might mean, as Lee suggested, nothing more than the use of two FL lenses of the same type as the one FL lens in the HT or it might refer to the use of Schott's recently developed N-FK58 XLD, which has a higher Abbe number than the other two FL type glasses in the Schott catalogue. In either case, since the designs of the SF and HT binoculars are so different, it's impossible to know whether "Ultra-FL" affects an improvement or is just needed to prevent the CA performance of the simpler SF objective from being worse than the HT.</p><p></p><p>Henry</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henry link, post: 3347206, member: 6806"] I totally agree about Zeiss marketing. They seem to supply ever less useful information. I've looked through everything I could find and still don't know what "Ultra-FL" means, but I'm sure it doesn't have anything to do with the HTultra glass types, which are just more recent HT glasses with even higher transmission (I think mainly in the UV). None of the HT or HTultras are FL types. Ultra-FL lenses might mean, as Lee suggested, nothing more than the use of two FL lenses of the same type as the one FL lens in the HT or it might refer to the use of Schott's recently developed N-FK58 XLD, which has a higher Abbe number than the other two FL type glasses in the Schott catalogue. In either case, since the designs of the SF and HT binoculars are so different, it's impossible to know whether "Ultra-FL" affects an improvement or is just needed to prevent the CA performance of the simpler SF objective from being worse than the HT. Henry [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Why would you buy a Zeiss HT over an SF?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top