What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Why would you buy a Zeiss HT over an SF?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Julian61" data-source="post: 3374526" data-attributes="member: 116235"><p>Having spent a few months the agonising over my 'bins for the rest of my life' choice, 8x42 with minimal shake and comfortable feel were crucial factors for me. I checked UV+, SV 8.5, SV 8x32 and both SFs. Optically they were all superb as I knew they would be. Two things made me go for the SF 8x. FOV was so impressive and was factor,but it was as much the smooth 'buttery' (as some describe it) focus I addition to the really comfortable handling that persuaded me. I initially thought the size would turn me off, but the way the barrels fall back into your eyes with the back-weighting made them so easy to hold. I need that ease as I'm not getting any younger. It's been the posts on this forum that have given me a sense of what's out there; having had a pair of Trinovids for the last ten years I was really out of date. I needed to hold all of them myself to properly compare. Even then, the adrenaline rush of the 'kid in the candystore' situation does weird things to your perceptions so I really couldn't tell much in the way of different colourations, 3D-ness etc between them all. I did go through three different u it's of zf before I choose the one I liked and that was down to smoothness of focus. I loved them in the shop but they're even better when the pressure's off. I have held and looked through HT s on a very cold day out on the moors in a gale. Optically superb but handling just not in the same league - they did look great though. </p><p>So, this is the experience of someone who just wanted a great pair of bins but didn't know much about the technicalities. Whatever the arguments in favour of this or that binocular, the feel has got to be right for the individual. Is there actually such a thing as a best binocular at this high level. </p><p>I don' t know. But I do know that I've got some fine optics and that I'm a very happy birder right now!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Julian61, post: 3374526, member: 116235"] Having spent a few months the agonising over my 'bins for the rest of my life' choice, 8x42 with minimal shake and comfortable feel were crucial factors for me. I checked UV+, SV 8.5, SV 8x32 and both SFs. Optically they were all superb as I knew they would be. Two things made me go for the SF 8x. FOV was so impressive and was factor,but it was as much the smooth 'buttery' (as some describe it) focus I addition to the really comfortable handling that persuaded me. I initially thought the size would turn me off, but the way the barrels fall back into your eyes with the back-weighting made them so easy to hold. I need that ease as I'm not getting any younger. It's been the posts on this forum that have given me a sense of what's out there; having had a pair of Trinovids for the last ten years I was really out of date. I needed to hold all of them myself to properly compare. Even then, the adrenaline rush of the 'kid in the candystore' situation does weird things to your perceptions so I really couldn't tell much in the way of different colourations, 3D-ness etc between them all. I did go through three different u it's of zf before I choose the one I liked and that was down to smoothness of focus. I loved them in the shop but they're even better when the pressure's off. I have held and looked through HT s on a very cold day out on the moors in a gale. Optically superb but handling just not in the same league - they did look great though. So, this is the experience of someone who just wanted a great pair of bins but didn't know much about the technicalities. Whatever the arguments in favour of this or that binocular, the feel has got to be right for the individual. Is there actually such a thing as a best binocular at this high level. I don' t know. But I do know that I've got some fine optics and that I'm a very happy birder right now! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Why would you buy a Zeiss HT over an SF?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top