What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Wilson's Storm-Petrel? Gloucester, MA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris Benesh" data-source="post: 1294900" data-attributes="member: 6775"><p>Hi All,</p><p></p><p>These are some tricky photos indeed. I'm going to steer clear of any definitive statements, but the photos do not strike me as being a storm-petrel such as Wilson's. The wing structure looks wrong (and Andy has explained why this is). In addition, the head is really small proportionate to the body, unlike any storm-petrel I've seen. Also, the nostril tube should extend further out the bill than the little nub visible at the base of the bill in the first photo. Having said what it's not, I'm less sure what it is. Most things about it can be explained by a juvenile/formative plumaged <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rasamoto/251615597/in/set-72157594301356212/" target="_blank">Laughing Gull</a>. I suspect that is what it is. The legs look thinner and more spindly than I'd expect, and then the bill looks small and thin. But perhaps it is lighting/angle etc. </p><p></p><p>Chris</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris Benesh, post: 1294900, member: 6775"] Hi All, These are some tricky photos indeed. I'm going to steer clear of any definitive statements, but the photos do not strike me as being a storm-petrel such as Wilson's. The wing structure looks wrong (and Andy has explained why this is). In addition, the head is really small proportionate to the body, unlike any storm-petrel I've seen. Also, the nostril tube should extend further out the bill than the little nub visible at the base of the bill in the first photo. Having said what it's not, I'm less sure what it is. Most things about it can be explained by a juvenile/formative plumaged [URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rasamoto/251615597/in/set-72157594301356212/"]Laughing Gull[/URL]. I suspect that is what it is. The legs look thinner and more spindly than I'd expect, and then the bill looks small and thin. But perhaps it is lighting/angle etc. Chris [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Wilson's Storm-Petrel? Gloucester, MA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top