What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Wind-Farms, 400 extra turbines.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MJB" data-source="post: 3299492" data-attributes="member: 88928"><p>Neat deflection. Denmark has high taxes generally because the political will was there to provide for a civilised society that looks after its elderly, its children's education, its physical and mental health funding as the priorities, which is why energy costs to consumers is high. I concede that political change could reverse that.</p><p></p><p>As for dumping energy on to other nations' grids, you'll have to provide citations from the countries involved, because there is no way that any recipient country can identify the origin of the electricity, be it wind, coal or nuclear. All countries on the shared European grids have inter-country financial agreements, and if there are exceptions in those agreements, you need to cite which agreements have those exceptions.</p><p></p><p>The costs of any wind-power subsidies Germany has paid for are but a tiny fraction of the costs of building new conventional or nuclear power stations and the decommissioning costs of the latter, which includes nuclear waste storage for millennia.</p><p></p><p>The costs of designing and installing a Europe-wide dc grid will undoubtedly be high, but the power losses that grid will experience is around one twentieth of ac grid losses. Load transfer across a dc grid (to supply power, for example from a windy area to a windless area) and load balancing are much simpler than for an ac grid, but because dc power can be stored, the need for large-scale transfers can be reduced. What doesn't exist at present is the infrastructure between a dc grid and household - design and production of mass-produced voltage step-down units is some way off.</p><p></p><p>Many household electrical items already are dc-powered, but when ac powere has to be converted to dc power, losses are considerable, and so the supplied power is more expensive than that from a dc grid. The potential for consumer savings is huge.</p><p>MJB</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MJB, post: 3299492, member: 88928"] Neat deflection. Denmark has high taxes generally because the political will was there to provide for a civilised society that looks after its elderly, its children's education, its physical and mental health funding as the priorities, which is why energy costs to consumers is high. I concede that political change could reverse that. As for dumping energy on to other nations' grids, you'll have to provide citations from the countries involved, because there is no way that any recipient country can identify the origin of the electricity, be it wind, coal or nuclear. All countries on the shared European grids have inter-country financial agreements, and if there are exceptions in those agreements, you need to cite which agreements have those exceptions. The costs of any wind-power subsidies Germany has paid for are but a tiny fraction of the costs of building new conventional or nuclear power stations and the decommissioning costs of the latter, which includes nuclear waste storage for millennia. The costs of designing and installing a Europe-wide dc grid will undoubtedly be high, but the power losses that grid will experience is around one twentieth of ac grid losses. Load transfer across a dc grid (to supply power, for example from a windy area to a windless area) and load balancing are much simpler than for an ac grid, but because dc power can be stored, the need for large-scale transfers can be reduced. What doesn't exist at present is the infrastructure between a dc grid and household - design and production of mass-produced voltage step-down units is some way off. Many household electrical items already are dc-powered, but when ac powere has to be converted to dc power, losses are considerable, and so the supplied power is more expensive than that from a dc grid. The potential for consumer savings is huge. MJB [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Wind-Farms, 400 extra turbines.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top