What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
World Population projection
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gandytron" data-source="post: 3263511" data-attributes="member: 47750"><p>Well, this is a cheery thread!</p><p></p><p>Whilst I can fully empathise with the doom and gloom, and ultimately agree that the probability of an Easter Island-esque collapse on a global scale is high, perhaps we can explore some ways in which the prospective horror can be negated?</p><p></p><p>For starters, as was mentioned in post #7 above, there is an urgent need for the international community to engage with "Population" as a serious challenge to human development. One way of doing this would be to establish a huge multilateral fund (similar the the Global Fund for AIDS, TB and Malaria, or the Global Environment Facility) that focuses on family planning, child and maternal health that can be used at national and regional levels to reduce birth rates and make sure that those kids who are born have a better quality of life, whilst ensuring that women have choices (as well as education that can offer them careers) can make a huge difference to birth rates (look at Singapore and Japan, for example) - mind you, even women I know here in Bangkok, who are very poor Burmese migrant labourers with minimal education are making these kinds of choices - I know one family where the grandmother was one of 18 children, she had nine children and her daughters have two children maximum and do not want more - whilst this will not stop the direction of demographics in its tracks, it will perhaps slow things down. Big challenges remain in the form of cultural norms and expectations on women, and tackling those will be especially difficult.</p><p></p><p>The other key challenge is meeting the aspirations/desires of the population that already exists (just compare the number of middle class consumers now compared with 20 years ago - the BRICS being huge consumer markets in a way that they just weren't in the mid 1990s). </p><p></p><p>Regarding the report itself, I would be interested to know if it has been peer-reviewed and how the numbers were arrived at - does it have academic rigour? I know enough people working in the UN system to know that it is often lacking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gandytron, post: 3263511, member: 47750"] Well, this is a cheery thread! Whilst I can fully empathise with the doom and gloom, and ultimately agree that the probability of an Easter Island-esque collapse on a global scale is high, perhaps we can explore some ways in which the prospective horror can be negated? For starters, as was mentioned in post #7 above, there is an urgent need for the international community to engage with "Population" as a serious challenge to human development. One way of doing this would be to establish a huge multilateral fund (similar the the Global Fund for AIDS, TB and Malaria, or the Global Environment Facility) that focuses on family planning, child and maternal health that can be used at national and regional levels to reduce birth rates and make sure that those kids who are born have a better quality of life, whilst ensuring that women have choices (as well as education that can offer them careers) can make a huge difference to birth rates (look at Singapore and Japan, for example) - mind you, even women I know here in Bangkok, who are very poor Burmese migrant labourers with minimal education are making these kinds of choices - I know one family where the grandmother was one of 18 children, she had nine children and her daughters have two children maximum and do not want more - whilst this will not stop the direction of demographics in its tracks, it will perhaps slow things down. Big challenges remain in the form of cultural norms and expectations on women, and tackling those will be especially difficult. The other key challenge is meeting the aspirations/desires of the population that already exists (just compare the number of middle class consumers now compared with 20 years ago - the BRICS being huge consumer markets in a way that they just weren't in the mid 1990s). Regarding the report itself, I would be interested to know if it has been peer-reviewed and how the numbers were arrived at - does it have academic rigour? I know enough people working in the UN system to know that it is often lacking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
World Population projection
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top