What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Wow those Nikon 8x32 SE's are Impressive!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henry link" data-source="post: 1375682" data-attributes="member: 6806"><p>Always hard to tease out cause and effect from an optical black box like a binocular. It's easy to assume that some difference we happen to know about must be the cause of an effect we happen to notice. Besides prisms, I can think of at least one other "significantly different optical element" that distinguishes most Porros from roofs. There is a simple cemented doublet objective in the SE and most other Porros vs a 3-5 element objective with wide air spaces and one moving group in most current roofs. The extra complexity in the roof objectives has nothing to do with the prisms. It's just for internal focusing.</p><p></p><p>The only roofs I have around are 8x42 and 8x56 Zeiss FLs with AK prisms. The contrast, light transmission, and sharpness (in the field center) of those compares favorably to the best Porros. If anything they look cleaner and more transparent, but I wouldn't be surprised to find that mid and low priced roofs are not that good. I suspect that in many of those phase correction is not complete, roof edges are not that well made and mirror coatings are not the best.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henry link, post: 1375682, member: 6806"] Always hard to tease out cause and effect from an optical black box like a binocular. It's easy to assume that some difference we happen to know about must be the cause of an effect we happen to notice. Besides prisms, I can think of at least one other "significantly different optical element" that distinguishes most Porros from roofs. There is a simple cemented doublet objective in the SE and most other Porros vs a 3-5 element objective with wide air spaces and one moving group in most current roofs. The extra complexity in the roof objectives has nothing to do with the prisms. It's just for internal focusing. The only roofs I have around are 8x42 and 8x56 Zeiss FLs with AK prisms. The contrast, light transmission, and sharpness (in the field center) of those compares favorably to the best Porros. If anything they look cleaner and more transparent, but I wouldn't be surprised to find that mid and low priced roofs are not that good. I suspect that in many of those phase correction is not complete, roof edges are not that well made and mirror coatings are not the best. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Wow those Nikon 8x32 SE's are Impressive!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top