What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Wow those Nikon 8x32 SE's are Impressive!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Dracon" data-source="post: 1386603" data-attributes="member: 14799"><p>Bob - I know that sounds like a tall tale from Montana. We have a bird book that lists the golden eagle's length from 30 to 40 inches, page 56 - Montana Birds by Putnam and Kennedy. That is a seven inch variation in length from Wheeler's 33 inches. Bald eagles are listed from 30 to 43 inches, page 50 in Montana Birds. I have no idea where the data on size comes from. It seemed to me at the time it was an extraordinarily large eagle. The golden eagles in this area give the appearance of being larger than the bald eagles, but the two species are not seen side by side so visual comparisons can't be made, and that may not be accurate. The bird I referenced may have been a freak of nature as is a person over eight feet tall. Certainly, I have never seen a golden eagle nearly that size ever again. But Wheeler's size description is a little bit on the small size.</p><p>in my judgment. Regional variations undoubtedly exist due to genetics and food availability. </p><p></p><p> Here in Montana we have had a series of warm winters. (not this winter) Geese and ducks by the thousands which used to fly south will spend the winter in parts of Montana in the proximity of wheat and barley fields if nearby rivers have any open water Even small streams gomg through towns will have resident ducks and geese that have become a nuisance. The deer and antelope populations are increasing. That plus the thousands of road kills of deer along the highways have created a ready food source for eagles. Destructive pesticides are no longer used here, and of course eagles are completely protected. I haven't seen an eagle count recently, but the birds are doing very well.</p><p></p><p>Today I watched a herd of over 150 antelope feeding on nearby slopes. A bald eagle perched on an abandoned beaver slide hay stacker a third of a mile away, while in a nearby stream mallards paddled around feeding. Right now this is a naturalist's paradise.</p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Dracon, post: 1386603, member: 14799"] Bob - I know that sounds like a tall tale from Montana. We have a bird book that lists the golden eagle's length from 30 to 40 inches, page 56 - Montana Birds by Putnam and Kennedy. That is a seven inch variation in length from Wheeler's 33 inches. Bald eagles are listed from 30 to 43 inches, page 50 in Montana Birds. I have no idea where the data on size comes from. It seemed to me at the time it was an extraordinarily large eagle. The golden eagles in this area give the appearance of being larger than the bald eagles, but the two species are not seen side by side so visual comparisons can't be made, and that may not be accurate. The bird I referenced may have been a freak of nature as is a person over eight feet tall. Certainly, I have never seen a golden eagle nearly that size ever again. But Wheeler's size description is a little bit on the small size. in my judgment. Regional variations undoubtedly exist due to genetics and food availability. Here in Montana we have had a series of warm winters. (not this winter) Geese and ducks by the thousands which used to fly south will spend the winter in parts of Montana in the proximity of wheat and barley fields if nearby rivers have any open water Even small streams gomg through towns will have resident ducks and geese that have become a nuisance. The deer and antelope populations are increasing. That plus the thousands of road kills of deer along the highways have created a ready food source for eagles. Destructive pesticides are no longer used here, and of course eagles are completely protected. I haven't seen an eagle count recently, but the birds are doing very well. Today I watched a herd of over 150 antelope feeding on nearby slopes. A bald eagle perched on an abandoned beaver slide hay stacker a third of a mile away, while in a nearby stream mallards paddled around feeding. Right now this is a naturalist's paradise. John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Wow those Nikon 8x32 SE's are Impressive!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top