You’ve probably heard of eponyms, those bird names that include a person’s name, such as ‘Cory’s Shearwater’ or ‘Temminck’s Stint’. Well, I don’t like them. There’s recently been a heated debate over eponyms, mostly in North America, because it’s been brought up that some people who are being honoured in bird’s names, don’t really deserve this privilege. This was the main line of reasoning by the ‘Bird Names for Birds’ campaign (BN4B) which ultimately resulted in the American Ornithological Society deciding that they would replace all eponymous bird names with new ones. While I approve the result, I’m not entirely a big fan of the reasoning nor in how it was communicated to the general public. While some cases are clear-cut, most are not and people who contributed greatly to our understanding of the birds of the world are being demonised for the wrong reasons.
I dislike eponyms for other reasons. My main concern is that eponyms bear no intrinsic meaning. Do you have any idea what ‘Verreaux’s Batis’ looks or acts like? Can you tell me anything about ‘Stephanie’s Astrapia’ or ‘Turner’s Eremomela’? These are examples of particularly meaningless names. With ‘Sabine’s Gull’ you’ll at least know that it’s a gull and ‘Levaillant’s Woodpecker’ likes to peck wood. But you got that info from the second part of their names, not the first eponymous part. I wonder if any person reading this text can tell me anything about the people being commemorated in the aforementioned bird names - without looking them up, of course.
Obviously, many people honoured in eponyms were important naturalists who contributed to our understanding of our environment. But any beginner birder or layperson will not know anything about them and most ornithologists and birders won’t be bothered to investigate the matter. This is the reason I dislike eponyms. It wouldn’t be false to say that I’m too lazy and uneducated to appreciate eponyms. I’m okay with that. I don’t want to research people who are long dead, however I want bird names to tell me something about the bird I’m watching, or at least the name should be cool. No idea, why the Rifleman is called that, but it’s a badass name. While I don’t know where the term Dunlin comes from, I know a guy who was named after the bird. That’s much more to my liking! A Pink-footed Goose is probably identifiable through its pink feet, a Marsh Owl to be searched in marshes and Siberian Rubythroat in Siberia. These names may not always be perfect, but I like them, there’s immediately a picture or even a scenery in my head, when talking about them. Lichtenstein’s Sandgrouse? Boyd’s Shearwater? Menetries’s Warbler? Nothing, no image, no scenery. I get that some birds are hard to name. Dozens of lookalike Storm Petrels or Larks that might even overlap in range aren’t easy to name creatively. But how much cooler would Wavehopper be than Wilson’s Storm Petrel?
In North America a process to rename all eponymous birds has started. While I may not always be on board with the reasons nor the process how things went, I’m all in for the results. Therefore, I’d like similar things to happen elsewhere. It’s okay, if you disagree with me and want things to stay as they are, because you’ve gotten used to how it is. I have no jurisdiction over bird naming anywhere in the world and likely won’t change anything anywhere, but I enjoy the thought-process of finding better, more evocative bird names. Meanwhile, I may learn a thing or two about the birds AND the people commemorated in their names.
Searching for the term >‘s < in the current IOC list of English bird names (v. 14.2) returns 815 eponymous names out of 11276 species (7.2%) with a handful of eponyms like Blackburnian Warbler or (arguably) Barolo Shearwater remaining hidden from this amateurish research. That’s a little too many for me and for now. But looking only at the list of birds recorded in the Western Palaearctic (WP) the list shrinks down to 102 taxa, many of these extralimital vagrants, some not even full species.
The following list should (hopefully) encompass all eponymous taxa recorded in the WP. It’s split into a list of species regularly occur in the WP and those that are mainly extralimital (including some introduced species). These categorizations are not perfect but are very rough approximation of what species a WP authority may have some kind of jurisdiction over (in theory) and which should better be left to naming authorities elsewhere. The line between Western and Eastern Palaearctic birds is especially blurry.
Extralimitals | | |
Ross’s Goose | Schrenck’s Bittern | Pallas’s Grasshopper Warbler |
Bewick’s Swan | Thayer’s Gull | Preuss’s Swallow |
Reeves’s Pheasant | Forster’s Tern | Blyth’s Whitethroat |
Lady Amherst’s Pheasant | Cabot’s Tern | Hume’s Whitethroat |
Erckel’s Spurfowl | Swinhoe’s Storm Petrel | Swainson’s Thrush |
Bruce’s Green Pigeon | Barau's Petrel | Tickell’s Thrush |
Pallas’s Sandgrouse | Jouanin’s Petrel | Naumann’s Thrush |
Allen’s Gallinule | Abdim’s Stork | Hume’s Wheatear |
Swinhoe’s Snipe | Rüppell’s Griffon | Rüppell’s Weaver |
Wilson’s Snipe | Wahlberg’s Eagle | Blyth’s Pipit |
Wilson’s Phalarope | Verreaux’s Eagle | Pallas’s Rosefinch |
Baird’s Sandpiper | Pallas’s Fish Eagle | Lincoln’s Sparrow |
Bonaparte’s Gull | Alexandrine Parakeet | Blackburnian Warbler |
Franklin’s Gull | Hume’s Lark | Wilson’s Warbler |
Kumlien’s Gull | Gray’s Grasshopper Warbler | |
For the WP birds, I’d like and try to come up with better non-eponymous names. These are sometimes influenced by existing names in other languages than English. Most are my own ideas; other more apt names may already exist that I’m not aware of.
Just like an advent calendar, from December 1st until December 24th I will post a couple of WP birds with (currently) eponymous names and some suggestions for new names. Your feedback or better ideas are appreciated.